The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field GeologistGeikie, Archibald
Science
The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field Geologist
Geikie, Archibald
Geology; Petrology
I have likened the boulder to an old volume of the middle ages encased
in a modern binding. We have looked a little into the mechanism and
history of the boards; in other words, we have gone over the history of
the scratched surface of the boulder, of the clays and sands around it,
and of that still earlier cycle of denudation whereof the rock itself
is probably a relic. Before proceeding to open the volume itself, it
will be well that we clearly mark the wide interval in time between
the ages represented by the surface-striation and those indicated by
the interior of the boulder. When we proceed from the groovings on the
outside to the plants within, we pass, to be sure, over scarcely an
inch of space, but we make a leap over untold millenniums in point of
time. It is as if we had laid our hands on a volume of history which
had by some misfortune found its way into the nursery. The first page
that catches our eye relates the battle of the Reform Bill, and, on
turning the previous leaf, we find ourselves with Boadicea and her
woad-coloured soldiery. Now, if one utterly ignorant of the chronology
of the country were to be told that the volume related solely to one
people, he would at once see from the manners and customs delineated,
that the two pages referred to very different states of civilisation,
and consequently to widely-separated periods. But he could give no
account of how long an interval might have elapsed between the time
when London had its inhabitants massacred by Boadicea, and the time
when another generation of them was excited by the tardiness of King
William iv. He could form no conjecture as to what events might have
happened in the meanwhile. The interval might be a century or twenty
centuries, wherein the city might have been burnt down fifty times.
Clearly, if he wished to make himself acquainted with the intervening
history, he would have to betake himself to an unmutilated volume.
And just so is it with our boulder. We can easily believe, merely from
looking at it as it lies on its clayey bed, that a long time must have
elapsed between the time of its formation as part of a sandstone bed,
and the period of its transportation and striation by an iceberg. The
sand of which it is formed must have been washed down by currents, and
other sediment would settle down over it. It would take some time to
acquire its present hardness and solidity, while, in long subsequent
times, after being broken up and well-rounded by breaker or current
action, it may have lain on some old coast-line for centuries before it
was finally frozen into an ice-floe, and so freighted to a distance.
But the stone, with all its stories of the olden time, can tell us
nothing of this intervening period. It leads us from a dreary frozen
sea at once into a land of tropical luxuriance, and so, if we desire to
know anything of the missing portion of the chronology, we must seek it
elsewhere.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account