The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field GeologistGeikie, Archibald
Science
The Story of a Boulder; or, Gleanings from the Note-book of a Field Geologist
Geikie, Archibald
Geology; Petrology
A remarkably graceful class of the coal-plants are known as
_asterophyllites_. They had slim fluted and jointed stalks, apparently
of humble growth. From each of the joints there sprang two thin
opposite branches with stellate clusters of leaflets arranged round
them at equal distances. If the reader will take a young rush-stalk,
and string along it a number of the flowers of the little star-wort,
keeping them a little distance apart, he may form some idea of the
appearance of a single branch of the star-bearing _asterophyllite_.
Some of the plants embraced under this genus are conjectured to have
been aquatic, spreading out their clusters of leaflets in the green
sluggish water of stagnant pools; but many of them are evidently
related to the calamites, and may possibly have formed part of these
plants.
Whoever has rambled much in a coal-country, scrambling through briars
and brambles in old quarries, or threading his way among the rocks
of river-courses, must often have noticed, on the exposed surface of
sandstone blocks, dark ribbon-like bands fretted over with little
diamond-shaped knobs. They are so common in some districts, that you
can scarcely light upon a piece of sandstone which does not show one
or more. They belong to a carboniferous plant known as _lepidodendron_
(Fig. 10) or scaly tree, from the peculiar style of ornamentation which
adorned its bark. Its structure and affinities have puzzled botanists
not a little. A well-preserved specimen reminds one of the appearance
presented by a twig of the Scotch fir, when stripped of its green
spiky leaflets. The scars thus left at the base of the leaflets are
of a wedge-like form, and run spirally up the branch in a manner very
like those on the branches of lepidodendron; and it was accordingly
supposed at one time that the latter plant belonged, or at least was
allied, to the conifers. But the branches of lepidodendron possessed a
peculiarity that is shared in by none of our present coniferous trees.
They were what botanists call _dichotomous_,--that is, they subdivided
into two equal branches, these again into other two, and so on. Their
internal texture,[19] too, differed from that of any known conifer.
The only tribe of existing plants with which the lepidodendron seems
to bear comparison, are the _Lycopodiaceæ_, or club-mosses, of which
we have several species in the moor-lands of our own country. They
are low trailing plants, with moss-like scaly branches, bearing at
their ends shaggy little tufts, whence the popular name of the genus.
In warmer climates, they are both more numerous and attain a larger
size, sometimes standing erect to about the height of an ordinary
gooseberry-bush. But though the lepidodendron appears to have been
allied to these plants in structure, it greatly differed from them in
dimensions. The club-mosses of the coal-measures shot up as goodly
trees, measuring fifty feet and upwards in height, and sometimes
nearly five in diameter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account