The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Hunter died in 1793, and there is no evidence that Jenner submitted
to his judgment the question of Vaccination, if even we allow that
prior to that date the project had occurred to Jenner himself.
It is certain that he mentioned to Hunter that country folk
believed that to catch cowpox was to be secure from smallpox, and
that Hunter repeated the fact in his conversation and lectures;
but there is no reference to the matter in Hunter’s writing and
correspondence.
It is the habit of Jenner’s admirers to represent him as a patient
investigator to whom a great thought dawned in boyhood, which was
brought forth in the maturity of life. In conformity with this
legend, it is related that when an apprentice at Sodbury, a young
woman came to his master’s surgery, and smallpox being mentioned,
she said, “I cannot take that disease, for I have had cowpox;” and
her observation was pondered in his heart; whereon Dr. Baron, his
biographer, ecstatically launches forth--
Newton had unfolded his doctrine of light and colours before he
was twenty: Bacon wrote his _Temporis Partus Maximus_ before he
attained that age: Montesquieu had sketched his _Spirit of Laws_
at an equally early period of life: and Jenner, when he was still
younger, contemplated the possibility of removing from among the
list of human diseases one of the most mortal that ever scourged
our race. The hope of doing this great good never deserted him,
though he met with many discouragements; his notions having been
treated with scorn and ridicule by some, and with indifference by
almost all.
Against such a paragraph we may write, Sheer romance! Jenner was by
no means reticent, and that the prevention of smallpox was for any
length of time the burden of his soul, nowhere appears. The romance
came into being after date in order to make much of little, and to
justify payment in cash and reputation. For, taking Vaccination
at the utmost, it was a slight advance upon existent knowledge
and practice. In the first place, it was a notorious belief in
many dairy districts, that to contract cowpox was equivalent to
smallpox in averting a subsequent attack of smallpox. In the
second place, inoculation with smallpox was the custom of the
time; and if infection with cowpox prevented smallpox, why should
not inoculation with cowpox do so as effectually as inoculation
with smallpox? The intelligence requisite to reach a conclusion so
obvious was not great, and therefore it was no cause for surprise
that when Jenner’s claim as originator of Vaccination was brought
forward, his priority should be disputed from several quarters; as
by Benjamin Jesty of Yetminster, who inoculated his wife and sons
with cowpox in 1774; by Nash of Shaftesbury; Mrs. Rendall, and
others. Jenner was not insensible to the force of these claims, but
evaded them under the plea that there was cowpox _and_ cowpox, and
that he had discovered and defined the right sort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account