The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
In 1767 had Cowpox. In 1791 was inoculated with Smallpox without
effect. Had also acted as nurse to Smallpox patients without
catching the disease.
V.--MRS. H----, Gentlewoman.
Had Cowpox when very young, contracted by handling dairy utensils.
Was subsequently exposed to Smallpox, “where it was scarcely
possible for her to have escaped;” and in 1778 was inoculated with
Smallpox by Jenner without effect.
* * * * *
At this point, I would draw attention to the ages of the persons
set forth in these Cases: they were past middle life when the
susceptibility to Smallpox was either low or extinct. The reason
given by Jenner for their production was that he “wished to show
that the change produced in the constitution by Cowpox is not
affected by time”--a claim which vaccinators at this day surrender,
insisting on the necessity of re-vaccination to maintain “the
benign influence;” but apart from that consideration, there was
nothing extraordinary in resistance to inoculated Smallpox. Without
the intervention of Cowpox, inoculators were constantly meeting
patients who would not “take,” even with repeated attempts, and
especially among elderly people; and some who obstinately resisted
inoculated Smallpox, subsequently contracted the disease in the
ordinary way. So much Jenner himself allowed, saying--
There are many who from some peculiarity in habit resist the
common effects of variolous matter inserted into the skin, and in
consequence are haunted through life with the distressing idea of
being insecure from subsequent infection. (P. 60.)
Yet he was pleased to refer this well recognised resistance to
variolation in those who had had Cowpox to Cowpox, allowing nothing
for habit of body!
VI.--SARAH WYNNE, Dairymaid.
In 1796 had Cowpox in May, and “in so violent a degree, that she
was confined to her bed, and rendered incapable for several days
of pursuing her ordinary vocation.” On 28th March, 1797, she was
inoculated with Smallpox by Jenner without effect.
Under this Case Jenner observes, that “among our dairy farmers
those who have had Smallpox either escape Cowpox, or are disposed
to have it slightly; and as soon as the complaint shows itself
among cattle, assistants are procured, if possible, who are thus
rendered less susceptible of it, otherwise the business of the
farm could scarcely go forward.” At the farm where Sarah Wynne was
employed, all had had Smallpox except Sarah, and all save Sarah,
escaped.
VII.--WILLIAM RODWAY, Dairyman.
In 1796 had Cowpox. In 1797 was inoculated with Smallpox by Jenner
without effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account