The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
About the imagination, there might be little difficulty: the
difficulty lay in the production of proof that any disease in man
was derived from disease in animals, and that disease so derived
was variously manifested. Jenner wished to have it believed that
a variety of Cowpox was generated from Horsegrease, which Cowpox
was the source of Smallpox. He adduced no evidence, however, to
connect outbreaks of Smallpox with Cowpox; nor did he ever suggest
that dairymaids caught Smallpox from Cows, or farriers from
Horses. His identification of Horsegrease Cowpox with Smallpox
was the resemblance of their pustules, and on the ground of this
resemblance he affirmed the equivalence of the diseases. Thus in
describing his first inoculation of Cowpox, that of Phipps from the
hand of Sarah Nelmes on the 14th of May, 1796, he wrote--
The appearance of the incisions in their progress to a state of
maturation was much the same as when produced in a similar manner
by variolous matter. This appearance was in a great measure
new to me, and I ever shall recollect the pleasing sensations
it excited; as, from its similarity to the pustule produced by
variolous inoculation, it incontestably pointed out the close
connection between the two diseases, and almost anticipated the
result of my future experiments. (P. 30.)
The similarity of the Cowpox and Smallpox pustules _incontestably
pointed out_ the close connection between the two diseases!
The observation and the conclusion are worth notice, being
characteristic of Jenner’s loose and illogical mind. He was
familiar with Tartar Emetic, and he might have observed that it
produced pustules on the skin exactly like those of Cowpox and
Smallpox; wherefore would it have been fair to argue that the
pustules being alike, their causes were incontestably identical?
Dr. Hamernik of Prague observes--
Some years ago the theory was brought forward, under the auspices
of the great alchemistical artist, Hufeland, that Vaccination
from Tartar Emetic pustules was a perfect substitute for
Vaccination with Cowpox, and had the same beneficent effect.
With this I fully agree; and I remark further, that if Tartar
Emetic pustulation is produced in Cows and Calves, and vaccine
matter is then taken from them, such Vaccination is also
perfectly harmless. The most convincing proof of the beneficent
and identical action of such Vaccination with that of Cowpox, is
furnished by the fact that it presents pustules similar in size
and form, therefore, necessarily of identical value.[99]
Having identified Horsegrease Cowpox with Smallpox, by reason of
similarity of pustules, he went on to assert that such Horsegrease
Cowpox was equivalent to Smallpox for inoculation, and was attended
with the like prophylaxy, saying--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account