The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Cowpox did not come before Pearson as a novelty, nor Jenner in
connection therewith. He relates--
When I was in company with the late Mr. John Hunter, about
nine years ago, I heard him communicate the information he had
received from Dr. Jenner, that in Gloucestershire an infectious
disorder frequently prevailed among the milch cows, named the
Cowpox, in which there was an eruption on their teats; that those
who milked such cows were liable to be affected with pustulous
eruptions on their hands, which were also called the cowpox; that
such persons as had undergone this DISEASE COULD NOT BE INFECTED
BY THE VARIOLOUS POISON; and that as no patient had been known to
die of the Cowpox, the practice of the inoculation of the poison
of this disease, to supersede the Smallpox, might be found, on
experience, to be a great improvement in physic.
I noted these observations, and constantly related them, when on
the subject of Smallpox, in every course of lectures which I have
given since that time. (P. 5.)
The communication of Jenner to Hunter was nothing of a discovery.
There was no secret in the existence of Cowpox, nor in the belief
that inoculation therewith fortified the sufferer against Smallpox.
Dr. Pulteney, of Blandford, informed Pearson that--
Cowpox is well known in Hampshire, Dorsetshire, Somersetshire,
and Devonshire. It is not unknown in Leicestershire, and other
midland counties; but dairymen keep it a secret as much as
possible, as it is disreputable to the cleanliness of their
produce. (P. 8.)
In the northern counties and in Wales, Cowpox was either rarely
seen or unknown. In Cheshire, as much of a dairy county as
Gloucestershire, where also men acted as milkers, the disease
was never met with. Where, however, Cowpox was recognised, the
faith in its efficacy against Smallpox appeared to be general,
and inoculators regarded it as a bar to their success. Thus Mr.
Giffard, surgeon, Gillingham, wrote to Pearson, 9th August, 1798--
Cowpox is more known in Dorsetshire than in most counties. Last
winter I inoculated three parishes, and some of the subjects
told me they had had the Cowpox, and that they should not take
the Smallpox; but I desired to inoculate them, and did so two or
three times, but without effect. Persons never take the Smallpox
after they have had the Cowpox. (P. 14.)
At a milk-farm on the Hampstead Road, Pearson found a man who had
often seen Cowpox in Wiltshire and Gloucestershire. He said that--
He had known many who had had Cowpox, and they never suffered
from the Smallpox, although it prevailed in their own families.
To use his own words, they who have had the Cowpox “are hard to
take the Smallpox.” (P. 29.)
Mr. Rolph, surgeon, Peckham, who had practised in Gloucestershire,
informed Pearson that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account