The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Cowpox was very frequently epizootic in the dairy-farms in the
spring.... A great number of instances of the Cowpox in milkers
had fallen under his observation, but not a single mortal, or
even dangerous, case occurred. There was not a medical man in
Gloucestershire, or scarce a dairy-farmer, who did not know
from his own experience, or that of others, that those who have
suffered the Cowpox are exempt from the agency of the variolous
poison. (P. 95.)
Dr. Croft likewise told Pearson--
That in Staffordshire to his knowledge, the fact had been long
known of the Cowpox, which prevails in that county, affording an
exemption of the human subjects from the Smallpox. (P. 35.)
Nor did what was so widely believed escape mention in medical
literature. Thus Dr. Beddoes, in _Queries concerning Inoculation_,
had written in 1795--
I have learnt from my own observation, and the testimony of
some old practitioners, that susceptibility to the Smallpox is
destroyed by the Cowpox, which is a malady more unpleasant than
dangerous.
And Dr. Adams, in his treatise on _Morbid Poisons_, 1795, observed--
Cowpox is a disease well known to the dairy-farmers in
Gloucestershire. What is extraordinary, as far as facts have
hitherto been ascertained, a person infected with Cowpox is
rendered insensible to the variolous poison.
And Dr. Woodville in his _History of Inoculation_, 1796, argued--
It has been conjectured that the Smallpox might have been derived
from some disease of brute animals; and, if it be true that
the mange affecting dogs, can communicate a species of itch to
man; or that a person, having received a certain disorder from
handling the teats of cows, is thereby rendered insensible to
variolous infection ever afterwards--then, indeed, the conjecture
is not improbable.
The belief, moreover, that Cowpox was good against Smallpox, had
tempted several to court the disease. The Rev. Herman Drewe wrote
to Pearson of himself and Mr. Bragge, surgeon, Axminster, 5th July,
1798--
Mr. Bragge and I endeavoured to try the experiment of inoculating
with the matter of the Cowpox, but from the scarceness of the
disease, and unwillingness of patients, we were disappointed. (P.
39.)
Mr. Dolling of Blandford related that--
Mr. Justings, of Axminster, inoculated his wife and children
with matter taken from the teats of a cow that had the Cowpox.
In about a week afterwards their arms were very much inflamed,
and the patients were so ill that the medical assistance of Mr.
Meach, of Cerne, was called for. The patients did well. They were
afterwards inoculated for the Smallpox by Mr. Trobridge without
effect. (P. 42.)
Dr. Pulteney of Blandford informed Pearson that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account