The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
I do not know that the condemnation of single punctures at that
time, seventy years ago, had much effect. Two punctures became
common, chiefly to guard against the possible failure of one. It
is of late years that the resort to many punctures has become
fashionable. Mr. Robert Lowe, now Lord Sherbrooke, in the House of
Commons in 1861 spoke of “the beautiful discovery which had been
made, that the security of vaccination may be almost indefinitely
increased by multiplying the number of punctures”! The chief
author of this remarkable discovery was Mr. Marson, for many years
surgeon of the Smallpox Hospital at Highgate. He estimated the
efficacy of vaccination by marks, and made so much of marks that I
usually think of him as Marks Marson. He said--“A good vaccination
is when persons have been vaccinated in four or more places
leaving good cicatrices. I define a good cicatrix in this way:
a good vaccine cicatrix may be described as distinct, foveated,
dotted, or indented, in some instances radiated, and having a
well, or tolerably well, defined edge. An indifferent cicatrix is
indistinct, smooth, without indentation, and with an irregular or
ill-defined edge. When I find that a person has been vaccinated in
at least four places, leaving good marks of the kind which I have
described, that person invariably, _or almost invariably_, has
smallpox in a very mild form.”
Reading a statement like this, we revert to the rationale of
vaccination, and ask what can marks have to do with its efficacy?
Remember, Marson offered no explanation of his statement. He was
satisfied to say thus and thus have I observed, and you may take my
word for it. But in science we take no man’s word. We must see, or,
like Trelawney’s Cornishmen, we must know the reason why. Marson
appeared before the House of Commons’ Vaccination Committee in
1871, and set forth his marks doctrine with all the qualifications
and inconsistencies which characterise the victim of a fad in
contact with facts which his fad fails to include or account for.
MR. WHEELER’S RESEARCHES.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account