The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Such is mercantile logic; and on its own conditions it is
irrefragable; but it is not the custom to deal with Jenner as a
tradesman, but as a man of science, and to range him with great
discoverers, inventors, and benefactors of mankind; and here it is
that I decidedly demur. What, I ask, did he discover? He did not
discover that Cowpox prevented Smallpox: that was the dairy-maids’
faith. He did not discover that Horsegrease prevented Smallpox:
that was the farriers’ faith. He did not discover that Horsegrease
on milkers’ hands begot pox on cows’ teats: that was the farmers’
belief. He did not discover that inoculated virus could be conveyed
from arm to arm: that was an existing practice. What then did he
discover? He discovered nothing. He did no more than take the
vulgar opinion of his neighbourhood to the London market. He made
a few perfunctory experiments by way of confirmation, advertised
them in a book, and by good or ill luck the notion was caught up,
and worked to practical issues, chiefly by Pearson, who thereby
incurred the full malignity of Jenner’s jealousy.
The distinction between a man of science and a tradesman is this,
that the mind of the one is set on the extraction of truth and
the other on the extraction of profit. The man of science does
not inquire what the public may be pleased to know and pay for,
but he ascertains and defines what is fact, and leaves the public
to adjust themselves thereto as they may find convenient. If they
recognise the truth communicated, it is well for them; if they
dislike or deny the truth, it is ill for them; but well or ill,
the man of science is the disinterested expositor of what he
knows to be true; not unfrequently, when his revelation vitally
affronts popular prejudice, realising the blessing of those who are
persecuted for righteousness’ sake.
What therefore I maintain concerning Jenner is, that the truth (as
we may presume he regarded it) he did not fully reveal; that what
he did reveal, he suffered to be derided and denied; that he was
content to take credit for so much of it as was marketable; whilst
his private conviction about Horsegrease remained unaffected, not
only in theory, but in deliberate practice.
It is for me to establish these assertions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account