The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Cobbett, be it observed, thus addressed Wilberforce in 1803, when
vaccination was as yet imperfectly tested, and its advocates
were in the full blast of enthusiastic persuasion that to be
Jennerised was to be made proof against smallpox for ever. When
Cobbett had again occasion to write about cowpox, six years had
passed away, bearing with them the phantastic certainty with which
vaccination had been imposed upon public credulity. Nevertheless
the practice was not abandoned: quackery once alive and lucrative,
dies hard: but it was discredited, and its apologists exercised
their ingenuity in devising explanations and excuses for its
manifest failures. The Royal Jennerian Society had split between
Jenner and Walker, and application to Parliament was resolved
upon for two purposes--first, to save Jenner from poverty; and
second, to provide funds for the maintenance of vaccination,
voluntary subscriptions having fallen off irretrievably. In short,
vaccination had broken down, and the House of Commons was called
upon to save it from extinction. There were wire-pullers in the
House and out of the House who were compromised by their patronage
of Jenner and his imposture, and they had the craft and the power
to transfer the responsibility of which they were sick to the
national exchequer. With this explanation, we shall understand the
following article from the _Register_ of 18th June, 1808. Cobbett
wrote--
This experiment with Cowpox, which has cost the nation £30,000
to Dr. Jenner, is now, it seems, to have an Act of Parliament
to give it currency. Mr. Rose has brought in a bill for the
purpose of establishing a central institution in London for the
distribution of Cowpox matter, which bill in all appearance will
pass; and this disgusting and degrading remedy will cost the
nation another £4,000 or £5,000 annually, though it has been
clearly proved not to have answered the purpose intended. This,
however, I regard as cheap when compared with the menace of Mr.
Fuller, who, in the debate, proposed a compulsory law on the
subject. He took up the old idea of Mr. Wilberforce, who was for
a law to prevent parents from having their children inoculated
with Smallpox unless they chose to send them to pest-houses,
or to some place at a considerable distance from any other
habitations. This cruel and tyrannical proposition I opposed
at the time; and I am happy to perceive that it is now almost
universally exploded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account