The Story of a Siberian Exile; Followed by a Narrative of Recent Events in PolandPiotrowski, Rufin
History
The Story of a Siberian Exile; Followed by a Narrative of Recent Events in Poland
Piotrowski, Rufin
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia; Polish question; Prisons -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia
Not that the change was made suddenly, or openly visible. It has been
developed by degrees, especially in the kingdom of Poland. Veiled at
first, during the lifetime of Alexander, by constitutional forms, it
was hastened, and no longer concealed, under the Emperor Nicholas,
whose policy may be described in one word, the _denationalisation_
of Poland. To accomplish this was the dream, the intense, unbounded,
ardent passion of a prince who was perhaps a great Russian, driven
by continental revolutions to play an exceptional part, but who left
dangerous traces upon European policy, and bequeathed a weight of
formidable difficulties to his successor. Yet it must not be said that
the Revolution of 1831 placed Poland at the mercy of this Tzar, or that
it released him from all his obligations, and gave him all the rights
of a conqueror; for, in the first place, that revolution was nothing
more than a reprisal--a desperate attempt at self-defence; and, what is
more, against any such policy there rise at once all the stipulations
of the Treaty of Vienna, and even all the words of the Emperor
Alexander--‘Your restoration is defined by solemn treaties.... I have
obliged Europe to guarantee your existence by treaties....’ The Emperor
Nicholas was, possibly, the fittest judge to determine what extent of
liberalism he could put into the institutions of the kingdom of Poland;
but he was not the only judge of what was, so to say, the European
essence of these institutions--of that which concerned their spirit,
according to treaty--of the preservation of the nationality of Poland.
Diplomacy had placed that matter out of his power, by putting it beyond
his reach. Now, this very nationality, placed under the guarantees
of all Europe, became, unfortunately, a particular foe of Nicholas;
and he persecuted it with all the inflexible vigour of his character,
in our religion and our language, in the autonomy of our interests
and institutions, in the independence of our hearths, in public
instruction, in our manners, and in our very dress. This originated the
system which, in 1831, substituted a new _statut organique_ for the
Constitution of 1815, and which, we must say, has been followed far too
long, and followed, also, in all the bitterness of a spirit irritated
by the resistance which it has met with.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account