The Story of Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland and of the new Gospel of Interpretation — John Shaqi
The Story of Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland and of the new Gospel of InterpretationMaitland, Edward
Religion
The Story of Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland and of the new Gospel of Interpretation
Maitland, Edward
Kingsford, Anna Bonus, 1846-1888; Mysticism
This was the construction of a system of thought which by force of its
appeal to both those two indispensable constituents of humanity, the
head and the heart, shall compel acceptance from all persons really
human, and in presence of which the whole system of which Vivisection
was the typical outcome and symbol should vanish from off the earth.
This system was Materialism of which only now did I discern the full
significance. The systematic organisation of wholesale, protracted,
uncompensatable torture, for ends purely selfish, was--I saw with
absolute distinctness--not an accidental and avoidable outcome of
Materialism, but its logical and inevitable outcome. And it was to the
eradication of Materialism that, from that moment, I dedicated myself.
It was a rescue work for both man and beast, seeing that humanity itself
was menaced with extinction. For the materialist, of course, that which
makes the man is the form. For me it was the character, and it was this,
the character of mankind present and to come, that was at stake. For man
demonised is no longer man. In the overthrow of Materialism, I saw
absolutely, was salvation alone to be found, whether for man or beast.
The consideration that only as an abstainer from flesh-food I could with
entire consistency contend against vivisection, was a potent factor in
determining my change of diet. True, the distinction between death and
torture was a broad one. But the statistics I now for the first time
perused, of the slaughter-house and the cattle-traffic, showed beyond
question, that torture, and this prolonged and severe, is involved in
the use of animals for food as well as for science. And over and above
this was the instinctive perception of the probability that neither
would they who had them killed, whether for food, for sport, or for
clothing, be allowed the privilege of rescuing them from the hands of
the physiologist; nor would the animals be allowed to accept their
deliverance at the hands of those who thus used them. They who would
save others, we felt, must first make sacrifice in themselves. And in
the presence of the joy of working to effect such salvation, sacrifice
would cease to be sacrifice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account