The story of Don Miff : $b as told by his friend John Bouche Whacker: a symphony of lifeDabney, Virginius
History
The story of Don Miff : $b as told by his friend John Bouche Whacker: a symphony of life
Dabney, Virginius
Richmond (Va.) -- Fiction; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Fiction
I shall not attempt to reproduce the sermon. His sketch of the advance
of skepticism in Europe, in England, and in the North, struck me as
labored; showing clearly that he had been set upon the task. But I shall
not criticise it. He was at home, certainly, when he pictured the life
of a pious, Christian woman whose yoke-fellow was an atheist. It was a
fearful picture (from the point of view of his hearers,—and he was
preaching to them), of which every detail was harrowing. But I leave
that picture to the imagination of my readers.
It is the last feather that breaks the camel’s back.
Alice had lost.
The dying cousin had won.
CHAPTER LXIV.
I have stated, elsewhere, that the dogma of the plenary inspiration of
the Scriptures was held, at this period, throughout the length and
breadth of Virginia. It was held, in truth, in a way to warm the heart
of a thoroughgoing theologian; for to doubt it was to be totally bereft
of reason. But many of my middle-aged fellow-citizens who are accustomed
to laugh at the Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility, will be
surprised when I remind them that, at that day, we believed, also, in
something very nearly akin to the plenary inspiration of sermons (those
of our own sect, of course).
And my Bushwhackerish candor compels me to go further, and to add that
it seems to me that we Virginia Protestants, at that day, carried the
dogma of parsonic infallibility to even greater lengths than Catholics
do that of the papal. For, as I understand it, it is only in matters of
faith that the Pope cannot err (and if he be infallible more than that,
I kiss his holiness’s toe and beg absolution); whereas, our Protestant
pontiffs did not hesitate to pronounce on all manner of
questions,—questions of hygiene, for example; going so far as to add an
eleventh commandment. As it is short, I will give it:
“Thou shalt not dance!” they cried in thunder tones; and, trembling,
their flocks obeyed!
Yet dancing is (as you may find in the first dictionary you shall lay
your hands on)—dancing is but the rhythmic capering of the young of our
species for a brief season (ah, _how_ brief and fleeting!). The rhythmic
capering of the boys and girls, reinforced, perhaps, by an occasional
widower (vivacious, high-prancing, nor hard to please), or else a
sporadic widow or so, forgetting her first and for getting her second.
This capering our Protestant pontiffs put down. Motion, _per se_, they
argued, was harmless; for the lamb, most scriptural of animals, frisketh
where he listeth. ’Twas the rhythm of motion that was hurtful.
“Miss Sally,” cried a colored slave and sister to her young mistress,
“you jump de rope and swing in de hammock, and you a member o’ de
church!” [Her very words; nor were they the remains of a half-forgotten
African fetich. They were a legitimate deduction from the theology
current in my young days.]
“Thou shalt not dance!” they thundered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive