The Story of Dutch PaintingCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
The Story of Dutch Painting
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Painting, Dutch
The readiest way to study the art of Holland in the seventeenth century
is under the separate heads of portraiture, landscape, marine, genre,
and still-life. In this way one obtains a comprehensive survey of the
development of each of these branches, and is not confused by the fact
that many of the artists practised in more than one of them. But at the
start it must be observed that these separate departments are inclosed
in a common motive. As Fromentin says, the art of Holland was
essentially an art of portraiture. It followed from the character of the
people and the conditions under which they found themselves. They were a
nation of burghers, practical in mind, direct in action, self-centered,
and full of personal and local pride. What more likely, in fact more
inevitable, than that they should need and their painters should supply
an art which gave a complete, exact, and for the most part unembellished
portrait of the country, its people, and their habits of life.
But while this common motive of portraiture, which distinguishes every
branch of Holland painting, was in response to a common and collective
need of the people, it was modified and shaped by the example of two
leading personalities: Hals and Rembrandt. So determining was their
influence that an analysis of their respective motives and methods is
not only a necessary preliminary but the quickest way to a comprehension
of the development of the whole school.
They had characteristics in common. One might almost represent the two
men by concentric circles; Hals being the inner, Rembrandt the
indefinitely larger one. Hals was an epitome of the genius of the Dutch
race; Rembrandt was also this, but more--the expression of a genius
peculiarly his own. Both manifested, Hals invariably, Rembrandt at
times, the quality of direct seeing and doing that was a national
characteristic; but at other times Rembrandt was possessed of a
spirituality, if one may so call it, that was directly opposed to the
prevailing practicalness. Let us study each for the purpose of
discovering what was his own personal art and how it affected the art of
others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account