The Story of Dutch PaintingCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
The Story of Dutch Painting
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Painting, Dutch
In Wagner’s mind great art, as he conceived it, stood out in clear
contrast against a background of less art, of art which is produced in
response to some more restricted impulse than that of a common and
collective need of the people; for example, in catering to the whims of
fashion. Such was the major part of the art of France produced in the
last days before the Revolution. The great mass of the people were too
abased by ill rule and exactions to have any consciousness but that of
hunger, any common collective need but to fill their bellies. The only
articulate demand to reach the artists was from the ephemeral swarm of
courtiers, sycophants, and, as we should say to-day, “grafters,” who
buzzed in splendor and profligacy at court. For a moment the glamour of
this life inspired a great artist, Watteau, who, however, it is to be
noted, was a foreigner. What he himself was he owed to Flanders. To him
the glamour of the French court was but a pageant, a spectacle passing
before his eyes, leaving his heart and conscience untouched. When,
however, artists of French birth, reared in the home environment,
followed in his steps, they revealed nothing of Watteau’s idealistic
detachment from the grossness of the theme, but became purveyors to the
shallow profligacy of their patrons. And to this day Van Loo, Boucher,
and Fragonard have no place with other old masters in the hearts of the
people; they are still the favorites of fashion. Nor was it until the
upheaval of the Revolution had precipitated the gathering consciousness
of a common and collective need on the part of the people, that French
art in the nineteenth century began to develop a vital response.
Moreover, what was characteristic of French art during the eighteenth
century was generally symptomatic of the art of the whole of Europe. The
latter had little or no creative force, was essentially an art of more
or less feeble and perfunctory imitation. For the age itself was
non-creative; a period of exhaustion after the strenuousness of the
seventeenth century, or of the slow forming of new alinements after the
shattering of the old ones; of speculation and doubts rather than of
convictions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account