The Story of EclipsesChambers, George F. (George Frederick)
History
The Story of Eclipses
Chambers, George F. (George Frederick)
Eclipses
In dealing with eclipses generally, but with more especial reference to
eclipses of the Sun, in a previous chapter, it was unavoidable to mix
up in some degree eclipses of the Moon with those of the Sun. There
are, however, distinctions between the two phenomena which make it
convenient to separate them as much as possible. Eclipses of the Moon
are, like those of the Sun, divisible into “partial” and “total”
eclipses, but those words have a different application in regard to
eclipses of the Moon from what they have when eclipses of the Sun are in
question. A little thought will soon make it clear why this should be
the case. A partial eclipse of the Sun results from the visible body of
the Sun being in part concealed from us by the solid body of the Moon,
and so in a total eclipse there is total concealment of the one object
by the other.
But when we come to deal with partial and total eclipses of the Moon,
the situation, is materially different. The Moon becomes invisible by
passing into the dark shadow cast by the Earth into space.
[Illustration: FIG. 13.—THEORY OF AN ECLIPSE OF THE MOON.]
Fig. 13 will make this clear without the necessity of much verbal
explanation. S represents the Sun, E the Earth, and _mn_ the orbit of
the Moon. It is obvious that whilst the Moon is moving from _m_ to _n_
it becomes immersed in the Earth’s shadow. But before actually reaching
the shadow the Moon passes through a point in its orbit at which it
begins to lose the full light of the Sun. This is the entrance into the
“penumbra” (or “Partial shade”). Similarly, after the eclipse, when the
Moon has emerged from the full shadow it does not all at once come into
full sunshine, but again passes through the stage of penumbral
illumination,[112] and under such circumstances (to speak in the style
of Old “Oireland”) the invisible Moon is very often not invisible, and
the part partially eclipsed is often not eclipsed, and when the Moon is
totally eclipsed it is frequently still visible. Of course the general
idea involved in all cases of a body passing into the shadow of another
body is that the body which so passes disappears, because all direct
light is cut off from it. In the case, however, of a lunar eclipse this
state of things is not always literally accomplished, and very often
some residual light reaches the Moon (of course from the Sun) with the
result that traces of the Moon may often be discerned. The laws which
govern this matter are very ill-understood. The fact remains that if we
examine a series of reports of observed eclipses of the Moon extending
over many centuries (and records exist which enable us to do this) we
shall find that in some instances when the Moon was “totally” eclipsed
in the technical sense of that word, it was still perfectly visible,
whilst during other eclipses it absolutely and entirely disappeared from
view. Such eclipses are sometimes spoken of as “black” eclipses of the
Moon, but the phrase is not a happy one.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account