The Story of Great InventionsBurns, Elmer Ellsworth
History
The Story of Great Inventions
Burns, Elmer Ellsworth
Inventions -- History
More power is required for the wireless than for the wire telegraph. In
the wire telegraph about one-hundredth horse-power is required to send a
message one hundred and twenty miles. To send a message the same
distance with the wireless requires about ten horse-power, or a thousand
times as much as with the wire telegraph. This is because in the
wireless telegraph the waves go out in all directions, and much of the
power is wasted. In the wire telegraph the electric waves are directed
along the wire and very little of the power is wasted. For the same
reason a person's voice can be heard a long distance through a
speaking-tube. The speaking-tube guides the sound and prevents it from
scattering somewhat as the wire guides the electric waves.
The overhead wires of a wireless-telegraph station send out a "dark"
light while a message is being sent. (See frontispiece.) Standing near
the station on a dark night one can see nothing, but can hear only the
terrific snapping of the electric discharge. The camera, however, shows
that light goes out from the wires. It is light of shorter waves than
any that the eye can perceive, but the sensitive film of the
photographic plate makes it known to us.
The Wireless Telephone
In sending a message by the wire telegraph the current flows over the
line wire when the key is pressed. When the key is released the current
stops. The circuit is made and broken for every dot or dash. This we may
call an interrupted current. Now we have seen that the attempt to invent
a wire telephone using an interrupted current failed. While one is
talking over the wire telephone a current (alternating) must be flowing
over the line wire. The sound of the voice does not make and break the
circuit, but changes the strength of the current. This alternating
current is wonderfully sensitive. It can vary in the rate at which it
alternates or the number of alternations per second to correspond to
sound of every pitch. It varies in strength to correspond to all the
variations in the voice, and reproduces in the receiver not merely the
words that are spoken but the quality of the voice, so that the voice of
a friend can be recognized by telephone almost as well as if talking
face to face.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account