"The proximity of this harbour to the Downs," says Mr. Smiles, "and
to the mouth of the Thames, rendered it of considerable importance;
and its improvement for purposes of trade, as well as for the shelter
of distressed vessels in stormy weather, was long regarded as a
matter of almost national importance. The neighbourhood of Sandwich
was first proposed for a harbour of refuge as early as the reign of
Queen Elizabeth, and the subject was revived in succeeding reigns.
In 1737, Labelye, the architect of [old] Westminster Bridge, was
called upon to investigate the subject; and ten years later, a
committee of the House of Commons, after taking full evidence and
obtaining every information, reported that 'a safe and commodious
harbour may be made into the Downs near Sandown Castle, fit for the
reception and security of large merchantmen and ships of war, which
would also be of great advantage to the naval power of Great
Britain.' The estimated cost of the proposed harbour was, however,
considered too formidable, although it was under half a million; and
the project lay dormant until a violent storm occurred in the Downs
in 1748, by which a great number of ships were forced from their
anchors and driven on shore. Several vessels, however, found safety
in the little haven at Ramsgate, which was then only used by
fishermen, the whole extent of its harbour accommodation consisting
merely of a rough rubble-pier."
It would seem that this circumstance once more directed the attention
of the public to Ramsgate as a suitable site for a harbour of refuge
for vessels caught in a gale in the Downs.
[Sidenote: Proceedings at Ramsgate.]
Petitions on the subject were addressed to the House of Commons, and
the Government taking it up, an Act was passed in 1749 authorizing
the construction of a harbour at Ramsgate.
The trustees invited plans from various individuals, and from these
selected a curious combination; adopting the west pier of one of the
amateur engineers, and the east pier of another, the former to be of
stone, and the latter of timber. The east pier was designed by a
trustee; the west, by a ship-captain resident at Margate.
While the works, thus strangely designed, were in progress, the
Harbour Trustees proposed to reduce their area, and consequently the
accommodation to be afforded to shipping. As soon as their intention
became known, the shipping interest memorialized Parliament against
it. In 1755 an inspection of the works was ordered, and led to their
suspension, nor were they again resumed for a period of fully six
years, during which the Government officials and the Harbour Trustees
carried on a war of words. When they were once more set on foot,
they proved eminently unsatisfactory, so far as their object was
concerned, the protection of shipping; large quantities of sand and
silt rapidly collecting in the harbour, and threatening to choke it
up altogether.
[Sidenote: Smeaton's proposal.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account