To the typical frontiersman, the Indian was a savage, ready to pounce on
careless settlers, scalp them, burn their homes, and carry off their
loved ones—in short, a “varmint.” To the romantic writers, the Indians
were children of nature, dwellers in shady forests and peaceful plains,
earth’s true nobility! Of course, the romantic writers seldom saw the
natives and never lived with them. These errors, and many others, have
been accepted as first-hand accurate observations. Indeed, the whole
American Indian policy has been called a tragedy of errors, beginning
with the naming of the race “Indian.”[164]
Given this background of Indian ways, what might reasonably have been
expected in the way of biracial adjustment? So little was the question
of Indian welfare considered before 1880 that one cannot yet determine
just what course might have solved the problem and brought about
successful assimilation. First the English, and then the Americans, just
muddled along, bribing here, cajoling there, and ultimately forcing
everywhere, until this once proud and militant race was reduced to an
inconsolable remnant, broken, defeated, and forlorn, but not forsaken.
Even when the white man’s heart was good toward his red brother there
was conflict in policies. Some thought his only salvation was in the
adoption of agriculture and stock raising, but such a program was
ruinous to the fur traders. The natives were the sinews of that
business. The contrast in economy and culture, rival claims to land, and
mutual feelings of superiority presented a gulf too vast for peaceful
desires to overcome. It was the realization of this fact that impelled
the wise Alexander Ross to say, “Peace in reality was beyond our power;
it was but an empty name.”[165] White men’s activities and aggressions,
under whatever guise, progressively deranged the Indians’ economy. From
every frontier came incessant demands for the reduction of Indian lands.
Memorials to Congress, complaints to Indian commissioners, blistering
editorials in local newspapers, all mark a stage in frontier
development. Settlers were intolerant of checks upon their expansion,
and few, indeed, were the officials who had the temerity to “arrest the
tide of empire in the Territories.”
Against this ominous force the Indians could only writhe and twist. The
uneven contest waged for two and a half centuries, extending from
Jamestown to the Pequot War and from Tippecanoe to Custer’s defeat in
the battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876. It is a tale of red fury and
white vengeance such as might properly appertain to an age of barbarism
but which presents an incongruous picture in a Christian land. It is
correct to say that Indian-American relations were never improved but
always embittered until the natives were reduced to the point of
decimation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account