Thus, we may fancy, thought the Algonquins, Iroquois, Mohicans,
Tuscaroras, and the Cherokees, the more sedentary eastern tribes early
to experience the white man’s aggression. At length they concluded that
their first welcome had been unwise and wrecked themselves in efforts to
drive the invaders out, but even in this purpose the tribes could not
unite. Alliances reluctantly made between them were carelessly broken in
the hour of peril. There is record of few confederations of Indian
tribes that acted with any degree of unity. The ordinary tribal
relationships were hostile. Indeed, every Indian tribe had at least one
implacable enemy. As Chief Little Plume once said, “As long as there
remains a Crow and a Piegan, so long will there be war.”[161] Even in
their campaigns with the white men they were inconstant and uncertain
and quite as much the victims of treachery and double dealing as they
were perpetrators of such offenses.
In what light was the Indian held by the white settlers of America? It
has already been noted that Europe’s Christian sovereigns and their
governors disregarded the Indians’ tribal ownership. They were
primitive, pagan, and of ill repute. Human beings they were, perhaps,
but with a hazy past, precarious present, and reckless future. If they
could be converted to Christianity, well and good. That blessing would
adequately compensate for the loss of their hunting grounds. Salvation
in heaven was far better than savagery on earth.
Hence, we learn that the Pilgrim Fathers first “fell upon their knees
and then upon the aborigines.” Roger Williams, William Penn, Zebulon
Pike, John C. Calhoun, and Brigham Young raised dissenting views, but
theirs were as voices crying in the wilderness. Other more self-seeking
councils prevailed. Many were the voices raised in condemnation.
General Phil Sheridan, in his oft-quoted comment, said, “There is no
good Indian but a dead Indian.... If a white man steals, we put him in
prison; if an Indian steals, we give him a blanket. If a white man
kills, we hang him; if an Indian kills, we give him a horse to put the
blanket on.”[162]
Another characterization from a Montana frontiersman goes, “An Indian’s
heart is never good until he is hungry and cold.”
Jim Stuart, than whom no man had more occasion to harshly judge Indians
about Yellowstone, made the following observation:
“Arro-Ka-Kee” or The Big Rogue [eminently appropriate, that name],
stood six and a half feet high in his moccasins and weighed two
hundred and seventy-five pounds. He was accompanied by “Saw-a-bee
Win-an,” who was a good Indian, although not dead, which I note as an
exception to the general rule.[163]
The Earl of Dunraven professed to express the Sportsman’s viewpoint when
he said that Buffalo Bill and Texas Jack had the same feeling for
Indians that they entertained toward game. That is to say, “They love
them, and they slay them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account