The story of operaLee, E. Markham (Ernest Markham)
History
The story of opera
Lee, E. Markham (Ernest Markham)
Opera
Io che d’al te sospir vagae di pianti
spar s’or di doglia or di minacie volto
Fei negli ampi teatri al popol fol to scolorir
di pieta voltie sembian ti.
while for an example of early operatic dance-music the final
“Ritornello” from the same opera may serve as illustration.
[Music: Final Ritornello in Peri’s “Euridice.”
Questo Ritornello va riplicato più volte, e ballato da due Soli del
Coro.]
[Sidenote: =Peri and Caccini=]
Peri led the way; others followed. In a short decade the North of Italy
produced a whole school of writers who had grafted their ideas on those
of the composer of _Euridice_, chief among them being Caccini, who
won great fame in the new style. But the chief merit must be accorded
to Peri, for it was to him that we owe the invention of the dramatic
recitative; that is to say, instead of coupling the dialogue to music
that might have been designed for the church, as his predecessors
had been content to do, he endeavoured in his operas to allow the
singing voice to depict the ideas expressed by inflections such as
would be made by the speaking voice under similar circumstances. As he
himself tells us in his preface to _Euridice_, he watched the various
modifications in sound made by the speaker in ordinary conversational
dialogue, and sought to reproduce these in music: “Soft, gentle speech
by half-spoken, half-sung notes on an instrumental bass; more emotional
feelings by melody of more disjunct character, and at a quicker rate,”
etc.
[Sidenote: =A Logical Commencement=]
Thus was opera, in our modern meaning of the term, begun, and this,
too, on a proper, logical, æsthetic basis. It was in 1600 a new form,
an untried and questionable innovation; but it contained the elements
of strength and endurance, and by rapid steps grew and developed, until
within a few short years all other methods of accompanying stage plays
by music were obsolete, and the new “Monodic” style held unquestioned
sway.
[Sidenote: =Its Imperfections=]
Crude it certainly was, for modern tonality, as we understand it, was
still undeveloped; harsh and ugly much of its music must have been,
for melody was unknown, time was practically non-existent, and of
form there was none. And yet, in so far as it sought in its music to
faithfully reproduce the dramatic situation, such work was more truly
of the essence of opera than many another of more recent date and of
greater success. Unlike the polyphonic choral music of its date, it
will not bear performance in our own day, yet for it must be claimed
truth, strength, and clearness of aim; as pioneer work it has been
invaluable.
CHAPTER V.
EARLY ITALIAN, FRENCH, GERMAN, AND ENGLISH OPERA.
Monteverde—Scarlatti—Cambert—Lully—Keiser—Purcell—Handel
in London—Handel’s rival, Buononcini—Handel’s
operas now obsolete by reason of their lack of
dramatic truth.
[Sidenote: =Monteverde, 1568-1651=]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account