[Illustration: _Battle of Barnet (From a M. S. at Ghent)_]
Warwick had at first his artillery on his extreme right, and this fired
through the gloom, but with no effect, as Edward’s right wing did not
extend so far, and was overlapped by the Lancastrians. This army was
commanded by the Earl of Oxford, who led the van, and by the Marquis
of Montagu, who led the second line; the left wing was commanded by
the Duke of Exeter--both wings being largely composed of cavalry.
The extreme left was occupied by archers and pikemen entrenched or
palisaded in a small wood. This probably extended at that time from
Wrotham Park to the column now marking the site of the battle, and near
which tradition says Warwick fell. The centre, consisting of bows and
pikes, was commanded by the Duke of Somerset; and behind this there
appears to have been a reserve under Lord St. John, Sir John Conyers,
and, for a time at least, Warwick himself.
The order of march of the host was with the right wing leading and
the left closing the column of march. On the other side, Edward
from his initial dispositions similarly outflanked the left of his
antagonist, opposite which was the Duke of Gloucester commanding that
wing, and presumably the artillery, if any. The left wing was led by
the Marquis of Hastings; and, as in the Lancastrian army, both wings
were mainly composed of cavalry. In the centre were the Londoners,
infantry armed with bows and bills, and in general reserve was a force
commanded by Edward himself. Some writers speak as if the armies were
formed in three parallel lines, but it would seem that the formation
customary for long after Barnet was that of two wings and a centre.
It is impossible otherwise to account for the curiously isolated and
impulsive attacks on either side by Oxford and Gloucester. Still, it is
practically certain that each of the three bodies into which the army
was divided was more than one line deep. Thus from the outset these
dispositions show a tendency to employ infantry in battle with cavalry
and artillery on the flanks, but the feudal idea still preponderated,
and paramount importance was still attached to the mounted arm, which
on both sides, as in all cavalry actions, simultaneously took the
offensive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account