It is only here and there that strategical enterprise is apparent,
while the old tactical methods too were changing, but very slowly. Mr.
Ward in his _Animadversions of War_, dated 1639, shows the cavalry
formed five ranks deep, and (as the battles show) an undue dependence
was placed on this arm, though in the early battles it, seriously,
effected little, and was rather a cause of disaster than of victory.
They were armed with firearms of sorts and the sword, the lance of the
Middle Ages having fallen into complete disuse. They were classed as
cuirassiers, arquebusiers, carbineers, and dragoons; but all fought
much the same way, and were, taken altogether, rather mounted infantry
than true cavalry. Each _battaglia_, even as late as 1677, so says Lord
Orrery in his _Act of War_, had still one-third of its number “pikes”;
the remainder, as “shot,” were assembled in groups at the four angles
of the mass of pikes, which were ten ranks deep; but at the beginning
of the Civil War the proportion of pikes to shot was about one-half. No
wonder that the weapon “which never missed fire,” and was sixteen feet
long, for many a year was all-important, and that the heavy arquebus, a
matchlock with a rest which trailed, was long looked on as an adjunct,
not as the primary weapon of the foot-soldier. The weapon was fired by
a slow match, and one common stratagem at night, in retreat, was to
leave these matches attached to the branches of trees in a hedgerow, to
make believe that it was still held after the defenders had actually
fallen back.
The general “order of battle” was two or three lines of these
_battaglia_ (named the “main battle,” the “battle of succour,” and the
“rear battle”) at close intervals, with the cavalry on the flanks, and
the guns dispersed along the front. In the beginning of the battle
small bodies or “forlorn hopes” were pushed to the front to draw the
enemy’s fire, much as the deployment of lines or columns later was
covered by light infantry skirmishers. The guns, immobile, badly
mounted, and badly horsed as they were, were not to be despised as far
as size went. There were “cannon royal” of 8 inches calibre, firing a
63-pound shot, down to “sakers” with 6-pound projectiles, and “bases”
of half a pound, and the range varied from 500 to 1500 yards; and the
“demi-culverin” with a 10-pound shot was a not uncommon field gun. Of
course their rate of fire was slow. There were no cartridges, and the
gun was fired, after being primed, by a linstock with a slow match.
Curiously enough, the first cannons were breech-loaders, and were
simply securely fastened into wooden slabs on low wheels by way of
carriage, and so were capable of very little elevation; but later on
they were furnished with trunnions on which the gun pivoted.
The colours worn by the men seemed to have followed the armorial
bearings of their leaders. Orange, the colour of Essex, was generally
worn by officers; Lord Saye’s men wore blue, Hampden’s green, and so on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account