The story of the Congo Free State : $b Social, political, and economic aspects of the Belgian system of government in Central AfricaWack, Henry Wellington
History
The story of the Congo Free State : $b Social, political, and economic aspects of the Belgian system of government in Central Africa
Wack, Henry Wellington
Belgium -- Colonies -- Africa -- Administration; Congo (Democratic Republic) -- History -- To 1908
Morrison did not utter one word
of complaint against the local administration of the Congo. On
May 7th, a member of the House of Commons again inquired whether a
petition had been presented from British Chambers of Commerce or
traders complaining that _trading rights_ on the Congo under the
Berlin Act were not respected, and what, if anything, the British
Government intended doing in regard to the matter. Finally on May 20,
1903, the House of Commons, pressed by organised British _commercial_
interests, passed the following resolution:
RESOLVED, That the Government of the Congo Free State having, at
its inception, guaranteed to the Powers that its Native subjects
should be governed with humanity, and that no trading monopoly or
privilege should be permitted within its dominions, this House
requests His Majesty’s Government to confer with the other Powers,
signatories of the Berlin General Act by virtue of which the Congo
Free State exists, in order that measures may be adopted to abate
the evils prevalent in that State.
On August 8, 1903, Lord Lansdowne addressed a dispatch[50] to the
Powers signatory to the Berlin Act, setting forth the grievances
which had been brought to the attention of his Government, and
suggesting that:
In these circumstances, His Majesty’s Government consider that
the time has come when the Powers parties to the Berlin Act
should consider whether the system of trade now prevailing in the
Independent State is in harmony with the provisions of the Act;
and, in particular, whether the system of making grants of vast
areas of territory is permissible under the Act if the effect
of such grants is in practice to create a monopoly of trade by
excluding all persons other than the concession-holder from
trading with the natives in that area. Such a result is inevitable
if the grants are made in favour of persons or Companies who cannot
themselves use the land or collect its produce, but must depend for
obtaining it upon the natives, who are allowed to deal only with
the grantees.
His Majesty’s Government will be glad to receive any suggestions
which the Governments of the Signatory Powers may be disposed to
make in reference to this important question, which might perhaps
constitute, wholly or in part, the subject of a reference to the
Tribunal at The Hague.
Three of the Powers, the United States, Italy, and Turkey, formally
acknowledged receipt of the British dispatch; all maintained silence
in respect of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account