The Story of the Innumerable Company, and Other SketchesJordan, David Starr
Philosophy
The Story of the Innumerable Company, and Other Sketches
Jordan, David Starr
Essays
At this time, at the age of twenty-five, Hutten is described as a
small, thin man, of homely features, with blonde hair and black beard.
His pale face wore a severe, almost wild, expression. His speech was
sharp, often terrible. Yet with those whom he loved and respected his
voice had a frank and winning charm. He had but few friends, but they
were fast ones. His personal character, so far as records go, was
singularly pure, and not often in his writings does he strike a coarse
or unclean note.
In these days, the two most learned men in Germany were Erasmus and
Reuchlin. They were leaders of the Humanists, skilled in Greek, and
even in the Hebrew tongue, and were called by Hutten "the two eyes of
Germany." A Jew named Pfefferkorn, who had become converted to
Christianity, was filled with an unholy zeal against his fellow-Jews
who had not been converted. Among other things, he asked an edict from
the Emperor that all Jewish books in Germany should be destroyed.
Reuchlin was a Hebrew scholar. He had written a Hebrew grammar, and
was learned in the Old Testament, as well as in the Talmud, and other
deposits of the ancient lore of the rabbis. The Emperor referred
Pfefferkorn's request to Reuchlin for his opinion. Reuchlin decided
that there was no valid reason for the destruction of any of the
ancient Jewish writings, and only of such modern ones as might be
decided by competent scholars to be hostile to Christianity.
This enraged Pfefferkorn and his Obscurantist associates. Pamphlets
were written denouncing Reuchlin, and these were duly answered. A
general war of words between the Humanists and Obscurantists began,
which, in time, came before the Pope and the Emperor. Reuchlin was
regarded in those days as a man of unusual calmness and dignity. Next
to Erasmus, he was the most learned scholar in Europe. He would never
condescend in his controversies to the coarse terms used by his
adversaries. We may learn something of the temper of the times by
observing that, in a single pamphlet, as quoted by Strauss, the
epithets that the dignified Reuchlin applies to Pfefferkorn are: "A
poisonous beast," "a scarecrow," "a horror," "a mad dog," "a horse," "a
mule," "a hog," "a fox," "a raging wolf," "a Syrian lion," "a
Cerberus," "a fury of hell." In this matter Reuchlin was finally
triumphant. This triumph was loudly celebrated by his friend Hutten in
another poem, in which the Obscurantists were mercilessly attacked.
We have seen with Hutten's growth a gradual increase in the importance
of those to whom he declared himself an enemy. He began as a boy with
the obscure Professor Loetz. He ended with the Pope of Rome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account