The Story of the Solar SystemChambers, George F. (George Frederick)
Science
The Story of the Solar System
Chambers, George F. (George Frederick)
Solar system
“Amid the radiant orbs
That more than deck, that animate the sky,
The life-infusing suns of other worlds;
Lo! from the dread immensity of space,
Returning with accelerated course,
The rushing comet to the sun descends;
And, as he sinks below the shading earth,
With awful train projected o’er the heavens,
The guilty nations tremble.”
Even Napoleon I. had servile flatterers who, as late as 1808, tried to
extract astrological influence out of a comet by way of bolstering up
“Old Bony.” But enough of poetry and fiction, let us hasten back to
prosaic fact.
[Illustration: Fig. 19.—Telescope Comet with a nucleus.]
Comets as objects to look at may be classed under three forms, though
the same comet may undergo such changes as will at different epochs in
its career cause it to put on each variety of form in succession. Thus
the comet of 1825 seen during that year as a brilliant naked-eye object,
after being lost in the sun’s rays, was again found on April 2, 1826 by
Pons. Lamentable were his cries at the miserable plight it was in. He
described it as totally destroyed: without tail, beard, coma or nucleus,
a mere spectre. The simplest form of comet is a mere nebulous mass,
almost always circular, or perhaps a little oval, in outline. It may
maintain this appearance throughout its visibility; or, growing brighter
may become a comet of the second class, with a central condensation,
which developing becomes a “nucleus” or head. It may retain this feature
for the rest of its career, or may pass into the third class and throw
out a “coma” or beard, which will perhaps develop into a tail or tails.
Doing this it will not unfrequently grow bright enough and large enough
to become visible to the naked eye. In exceptional cases the nucleus
will become as bright as a 2nd or even 1st magnitude star, and the tail
may acquire a length of several or many degrees. In the last named case
of all the comet becomes, _par excellence_ according to the popular
sentiment, “a comet.” It will now be readily inferred that the
astronomer in his observatory has to do with many comets which the
public at large never hear of, or if they do hear of, treat with
contempt, because they are destitute of tails.
[Illustration: Fig. 20.—Wells’s Comet of 1882, seen in full daylight
near the Sun on Sept. 18.]
[Illustration: Fig. 21.—Quenisset’s Comet, July 9, 1893 (Quenisset).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account