The Story of the Sun: New York, 1833-1918O'Brien, Frank Michael
History
The Story of the Sun: New York, 1833-1918
O'Brien, Frank Michael
Sun (New York, N.Y. : 1833)
The _Sun_ supported McClellan, praising him for his repudiation of the
plank in the Democratic platform which declared the war a failure; but
in the last days of the campaign it was frank in its predictions that
Lincoln would be elected. On the morning after election it had this to
say:
The reelection of Abraham Lincoln announces to the world how
firmly we have resolved to be a free and united people.
After the assassination of President Lincoln the _Sun_ said:
In the death of Mr. Lincoln the Southern people have lost
one of the best friends they had at the North. He would have
treated them with more gentleness than any other statesman.
From him they would have obtained concessions it is now almost
impossible for our rulers and people to grant.
The _Sun’s_ attitude toward the copperheads and deluded pacifists of
the North is reflected in an editorial article published on June 5,
1863. The North was then in its worst panic. Only a month previously
Lee had defeated Hooker at Chancellorsville, and the victorious
Confederates were marching through Maryland into Pennsylvania. At
a mass-meeting in Cooper Union, George Francis Train and other
copperheads denounced the war, praised Vallandigham, of Ohio, who had
been banished into the South for his unpatriotic conduct, and declared
for “peace and reunion.” It was largely a Democratic meeting, but the
_Sun_ would not stomach the disloyal outburst:
The fact that over ten thousand people assembled in and about
Cooper Union on Thursday evening to listen to speeches and
adopt an address and resolutions prepared under that “eye
single to the public welfare,” discloses the ease with which
a few political tricksters may present false issues to the
unthinking and, in the excitement of the moment, induce their
hearers to applaud sentiments that, when calmly considered,
are unworthy of a great and free people. Taking advantage of
the blunders of the present administration, these self-styled
Democrats raise their banners and, under the guise of
proclaiming peace, in reality proclaim a war upon those very
principles it is the highest boast of every true Democrat to
acknowledge.
The Democratic party is essentially the peace party of the
present rebellion; but it will sanction no peace that is
obtained by compromising the vital principles that give force
to our form of government. They will not ask for peace at the
expense of the Union, and desire no Democratic victories that
do not legitimately belong to them as an expression of the
confidence of the people in their fidelity to the Union and the
Constitution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account