The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
Apparently also in the fifteenth century an Orthodox bishop was settled
at Mukachevo, but this again did not mean much. The monasteries
had lost most of their wealth in the disturbances of the preceding
centuries and the bishops had to live on fees collected from the
ordination of young priests and the annual contributions that they were
compelled to make for the support of the central organization. It was
the same situation that had come up elsewhere in the Ukrainian lands
but there was really no centre to maintain any education and things
went constantly from bad to worse.
It was an ideal situation for the spreading of the religious Union.
One of the landowners, Homonai, introduced it on his estates in the
seventeenth century. He won over the priests and monks, but the
peasants, as they had done so often, refused to accept it. However,
the idea took root and by 1640 a considerable number had more or less
formally adhered, so that in 1649 it was possible for the adherents to
hold a meeting at Uzhorod and formally request to be accepted under the
same terms as had been satisfactory fifty years before at Brest. The
Pope acknowledged this in 1652.
As can be seen from the above, the struggle for the Union or the
Orthodox faith in Carpatho-Ukraine, as everything else in the area,
was far less centralized, far less standardized, and the villages
maintained a certain independence in their misery, for the Hungarian
system of administration had grouped the area into several counties
with little possibility of cooperation or mutual help.
There were times, however, when the temper of the people flared up to
white heat and revolts broke out or were threatened. Thus, for example,
at the time of the outbreak of the Koliishchina in the province of
Kiev, around 1770, there was marked unrest in this area. The peasants,
some of whom apparently did not know that they had accepted the Union,
turned against their landlords and the Uniat priests and there were
repeated on a small scale those disorders that marked the disturbances
in the East. There were the same rumors that the Orthodox ruler of the
east was going to come to their assistance and, as elsewhere, no help
ever came, and the authorities put down the revolt and the unrest with
an iron hand.
The Empress Maria Theresa of Austria and her son Joseph II were made
uneasy by these troubles. They were already looking with greedy eyes
at the southwestern sections of Poland and of Western Ukraine, and it
did not seem a wise policy to allow disorders to spread among people
related to those whom they were desirous of annexing. Besides that,
the old feuds as to the relative rights of Austria and Hungary became
involved in the picture and once peace had been restored, the rulers
began to look around to see what could be done.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account