The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
In 1875, a former friend of Kostomarov, one M. Yuzefovich, reported
to authorities on the separatist tendencies of this work of the Kiev
Hromada. As a result a commission was appointed consisting of him, the
Ministers Timashev and Tolstoy and the Chief of the Gendarmes, Potapov,
to study the dangerous situation that prevailed in “Little Russia.” The
committee reported that, “the entire literary activity of the so-called
Ukrainophiles must be considered as an attempt on the national
unity and wholeness of Russia, only hidden by plausible forms.” As
a result, the Tsar issued an order on May 18, 1876, forbidding the
importation of books printed abroad in the Little Russian dialect and
also forbidding the printing and publishing in the Empire of original
works and translations in this dialect with the exception only of:
“(a) historical documents and monuments; (b) works of belles-lettres,
but with the proviso that with the printing of historical monuments
there must be kept the correct orthography of the originals; in works
of belles-lettres there must not be allowed any deviations from the
generally accepted Russian orthography and that the permission to print
works of belles-lettres should be given not otherwise than after the
examination of the manuscripts in the Central Administration of the
Press; and (c) forbidding various theatrical presentations and readings
in the Little Russian dialect and also the printing of such a text to
musical notes.”
It is well to note the emphasis laid upon spelling in this decree. In
the seventeenth century Great Russian had been taught from Ukrainian
Church Slavonic grammars, as that of Smotritsky, and the students had
been taught to make the necessary corrections in pronunciation. Once
practice had brought to these letters the Russian values during the
intervening centuries, the acceptance of the Russian pronunciation
made difficulties for the pronunciation of Ukrainian words. Kulish had
prepared a new alphabet which retained the Cyrillic script but which
was suited to Ukrainian and this was being generally accepted by the
modern Ukrainian authors. It was to resist this influence that the
government decided not only to bar the new literature, but even where
it allowed it, to bar the new alphabet and thus create another obstacle
to the spread of the “Little Russian dialect.”
The result might have been foreseen. Some of the more timorous souls
dropped away from literature and consented to write in Great Russian.
The others who were more determined, worked the harder to enter
Galicia and to profit by the relative freedom there. The decree merely
furnished more fuel to the fire and instead of ending the Ukrainian
movement it caused it to take even more extreme forms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account