The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
Allied diplomacy was singularly ineffective. After welcoming the
Revolution, England, France and the United States were unable to induce
the Provisional Government to continue the war effectively. They were
opposed to a peace between Russia or any part of it with the Central
Powers. They were willing to cooperate with the Ukrainian Council or
any other government that would continue the war. They were willing
to recognize the Council as the de facto government of Ukraine and
threatened it, if it made peace. They were willing to oppose the
Bolsheviks, when they talked peace. On the other hand, the military
missions that appeared in Kiev did not have the power to guarantee
that they would continue to recognize the Council after the war and
they most assuredly had no plans for supplying the Ukrainian army and
making it able to oppose the Bolsheviks successfully, much less the
Germans and Austro-Hungarians, if they decided to resume the offensive.
What might have been done in Archangel or Vladivostok was impossible in
Kiev, with Ukraine barred from access to Allied supplies and assistance
by the Central Powers on the west and the Bolsheviks on the north and
east. Ukraine was fighting a war on two fronts, and relations between
the Germans and the Bolsheviks were such that peace between Germany
and the Bolsheviks might result in Germany turning over Ukraine to the
Bolsheviks as the price of peace. Again this threat, the words of small
military missions were little defence, especially when the Ukrainian
leaders knew of the widespread propaganda that had been directed
against them abroad by imperial Russia for nearly four years.
In the meanwhile conditions were becoming more critical in the country.
The Council suffered from the same misconceptions that had ruined
the Provisional Government. It was or felt itself unable to check
barely concealed Bolshevik propaganda because of its interpretation of
democracy. Its leaders, busied with negotiations with the Provisional
Government, had not been able to use all their energies in building
up a firm kernel of organization and in strengthening their own armed
forces to a point where they could be sure of their unqualified
support. Far too often resolutions that were adopted became dead
letters almost as soon as they were passed. Regulations on the
distribution of land, and others, were more honored in the breach than
the observance. Despite the efforts of many of the members, it could
hardly be said that many of the difficulties were being overcome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account