The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
In 1169 Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky sacked the city of Kiev. It was the
most destructive of any of the attacks that had been made against the
southern capital, for this time it was an attempt at ruin and not at
control. When Prince Andrey ordered his soldiers to ravage the city, he
did it because he had no intention of remaining there and making it his
capital. The earlier princes had fought for Kiev; Prince Andrey fought
against it. There was no point in plundering ruthlessly a capital which
the conquerors desired for themselves. There was no reason for sparing
a city which the conquerors desired to ruin. Everything that was of
value, whether of ecclesiastical or civil character, was taken and
the plunder-laden hosts resumed the march to their northern citadel
of Suzdal. Even the Metropolitan of Kiev, the head of the Church,
was taken along with them and Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky could look
with satisfaction at his conquests. He could be sure that it would be
decades, if not longer, before Kiev would rise again from the ruins and
dare to threaten his hegemony.
This sack of Kiev was the most important date in the history of the
country after the introduction of Christianity, for it marked the
separation of Kiev and the northern cities, the line of demarcation
between Ukraine-Rus’ and Moscow. It is idle to speculate what was in
the minds of conquerors and conquered at the very moment of the battle.
There can be no doubt that the princes of Suzdal were the lineal
descendants of Volodymyr and Yaroslav. There can be no doubt too that
their armies were largely composed of men who had never seen and felt
the charm of Kiev, who had no appreciation for the ancient culture of
the old metropolis.
Ukrainian thought has been insistent for centuries that this was
a foreign conquest. The princes of Galicia with the downfall of
Kiev took in a few years the title of Grand Princes of Rus’. They
proudly ignored the new principalities and strove to continue the old
traditions.
To Moscow and the northern princes, this conquest meant the transfer to
them of all the primacy that had clustered around the fallen city. They
proudly called themselves and their metropolitans the rulers of Rus’,
but even so they much preferred to call themselves the Grand Princes of
Moscow. They sneered at their victims and it was many centuries before
they sought to value the city from which they secured their power.
Henceforth the two states went on their independent ways and whatever
unity still survived was to perish in the new historical developments.
While Kiev was still struggling to repair the damage of the terrible
plundering, there appeared a new invader. In 1224 there came the
first onslaught of the forces of Genghis Khan, the dread lord of the
Mongolian Empire. He defeated the combined princes at a battle on the
Kalka River and killed Mstislav of Kiev, but his forces soon withdrew.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account