The story of the universe. Volume 1 (of 4) : $b The starry skies — John Shaqi
The story of the universe. Volume 1 (of 4) : $b The starry skies
History
The story of the universe. Volume 1 (of 4) : $b The starry skies
Astronomy; Earth (Planet); Natural history
In 1849, Hofmeister began investigations into the life-histories of
plants, since when the study of Vegetable Physiology has progressed
side by side with Chemistry. To Darwin great subjects are due:
the cross-fertilization of plants, their reproduction, and their
relations to insects and their movements. It may be mentioned,
however, that in 1693 Ray attempted to explain the movements of
leaves, tendrils, and petals by physical and mechanical laws.
Since the middle of the Nineteenth Century, the branches of Botany
that have been particularly studied are Vegetable Physiology and
Pathology, Inner Morphology, and Fossil Botany—and the discoveries
made have naturally had an effect upon the classification of
vegetable life.
According to Agassiz:
“We must come down to the last century, to Linnæus, before we find
the history taken up where Aristotle had left it, and some of his
suggestions carried out with new freshness and vigor. Aristotle
had already distinguished between genera and species; Linnæus took
hold of this idea, and gave special names to other groups, of
different weight and value. Besides species and genera, he gives
us orders and classes—considering classes the most comprehensive,
then orders, then genera, then species. He did not, however,
represent these groups as distinguished by their nature, but only
by their range; they were still to him, as genera and species had
been to Aristotle, only larger or smaller groups, not founded upon
and limited by different categories of structure. He divided the
animal kingdom into six classes: Mammalia, Birds, Reptiles, Fishes,
Insects, and Worms.”
Linnæus’s classification was, therefore, the first attempt to
group animals; but until Cuvier there was no great principle of
classification. In 1707 Buffon succeeded in making Zoology, which had
been regarded as a most uninteresting study, popular and respected.
He also had the idea of collecting all the known facts of scientific
investigation and arranging them systematically. Buffon was ridiculed
as a scientist by his contemporaries, Hevelius, Diderot, D’Alembert,
and Condillac, who opposed his explanations of natural phenomena.
Buffon’s _Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière_ is his most
important work. A complete edition in thirty-six volumes appeared in
Paris in 1749-1788. Although it is said to “have made an epoch in
the study of the natural sciences” in Buffon’s day, it now possesses
little scientific value.
Cuvier’s classification has never been overthrown. His original
investigations in various departments of science, and particularly
that of fossil vertebrate animals, opened up new fields of study. His
talents with both pen and pencil contributed largely to making that
branch of science popular.
Lamarck, Cuvier’s contemporary, divided the animal kingdom into
Vertebrates and Invertebrates. Lamarck, like Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire,
was a believer in the theory of evolution, which was opposed by
Cuvier.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account