The story of the universe. Volume 4 (of 4) : $b The earth's creatures : fauna
History
The story of the universe. Volume 4 (of 4) : $b The earth's creatures : fauna
Astronomy; Earth (Planet); Natural history
This course of classification might have been followed to a much
greater extent, for the differences among men are so great that if
strict rule is not adhered to it is impossible to fix any limit to
species. Unless therefore the principle of unity has been fully
conceded at starting, the investigation may result in the admission
of a truly indefinite quantity.
This is the principle which pervades the writings of the most
learned of all the anthropologists of our age, Dr. Pritchard, author
of a _Natural History of Man_, which in the original text formed
ten volumes, but of which the French language possesses but a very
incomplete translation.
Dr. Pritchard holds that all people of the earth belong to the same
species; he is a partisan of the unity of the human species, but
is not satisfied with any of the classifications already proposed,
and which were founded upon organic characteristics. He, in fact,
entirely alters the aspect of the ordinary classifications which
are to be met with in natural history. He commences by pointing
out three families, which, he asserts, were in history the first
human occupants of the earth: namely, the _Aryan_, _Semitic_, and
_Egyptian_. Having described these three families, Pritchard passes
to the people who, as he says, radiated in various directions from
the regions inhabited by them, and proceeded to occupy the entire
globe.
This mode of classification, as we have pointed out, leaves the
beaten track trodden by other natural historians. For this reason it
has not found favor among modern anthropologists, and this disfavor
has reacted upon the work itself, which, notwithstanding, is the most
complete and exact of all that we possess upon man. Although it has
been adopted by no other author, Pritchard’s classification of the
human race appears to us to be the most sound in principle.
The classification of the human race which we propose to follow,
modifying it where in our opinion it may appear to be necessary, is
due to a Belgian naturalist, M. d’Omalius d’Halloy. It acknowledges
five races of men: the white, black, yellow, brown, and red.
When we examine the form and relative size of the brain in
ascending the series of mammiferous animals, we find that this
organ increases in volume, and progresses, so to say, toward the
superior characteristics which it is to display in the human
species. The brain increases in importance from the zoophyte to
the ape. But, in comparing the brain of the ape with that of man,
an important difference becomes at once apparent. The brain of the
gorilla, orang-outang, or chimpanzee, which are the apes that bear
the greatest resemblance to man, and which for that reason are
designated _anthropomorphous_ apes, is very much smaller than that of
man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account