The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
AT THIS TIME OUR GREATEST NEED IS NOT MEN OR MONEY,
VALIANT GENERALS OR BRILLIANT VICTORIES, BUT A CONSISTENT
NATIONAL POLICY BASED UPON THE PRINCIPLES THAT
ALL GOVERNMENTS DERIVE THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE
CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.
The third Susan B. Anthony banner said:
THE RIGHT OF SELF-GOVERNMENT FOR ONE-HALF OF ITS
PEOPLE IS OF FAR MORE VITAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE NATION
THAN ANY OR ALL OTHER QUESTIONS.
On March 2, 1917, the Congressional Union and its Western organization,
the Woman’s Party, met in joint convention and organized themselves into
the National Woman’s Party.
On that occasion, Alice Paul said:
We feel that by combining the Congressional Union and the Woman’s
Party we shall bring about a unity in organization which will make
impossible duplication, difference of opinion, and divergence of
method. By uniting we make, moreover, for unity of spirit in the
whole Suffrage movement, bringing the voters and non-voters together
in a movement in which they should both be integral parts.
The original purpose for which the Woman’s Party, as an organization
confined to women voters alone, was formed, has, we believe, been
served. In the first three years of our work we endeavored to call
the attention of political leaders and Congress to the fact that
women were voting and that these voting women were interested in
Suffrage. But words alone did not have much effect. We found we had
to visualize the existence of voting women out in the West and their
support of the Suffrage Amendment. The Woman’s Party was formed as
one means of doing this.
The Woman’s Party did, I believe, have an effect on the political
leaders. It was very clear, I think, at the convention in Chicago
and in St. Louis that the idea that women were voting and that those
women were interested in the Federal Amendment was at last
appreciated. This November’s election completed our work in getting
that fact into the minds of Congressmen and political leaders. There
is no longer any need to draw a line around women voters and set
them off by themselves in order to call attention to them. They now
enter into the calculations of every political observer.
If we amalgamate and make ourselves one great group of voters and
non-voters all working for the Federal Amendment, the question
arises: What name shall we be called by, the Congressional Union or
the Woman’s Party? Our Executive Committee felt that we ought to
keep the name of the Woman’s Party, because it stands for political
power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account