The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
THE first great demonstration of the Congressional Committee—the
procession of March 3—had been designed to attract the eye of the
country to the Suffragists. It succeeded beyond their wildest hopes.
Thereafter it became a part of the policy of the Congressional
Committee—later, the Congressional Union, and later still, the National
Woman’s Party—to keep the people watching the Suffragists. The main work
of the Congressional Committee, however, focussed directly on Congress,
as of course Congress alone could pass a Constitutional Amendment. They
appealed to Congress constantly, by different methods, and through
different avenues. They appealed to Congress through the President of
the United States, through political leaders, through constituents. It
is one way of describing their system to say that they worked on
Congress by a series of electric shocks delivered to it downwards from
the President, and by a constant succession of waves delivered upwards
through the people. This pressure never ceased for a moment. It
accumulated in power as the six years of this work went on.
* * * * *
When President Wilson arrived in Washington for his inauguration, the
first thing brought to his notice was Suffrage agitation. The
Congressional Committee thereafter kept Suffrage constantly before him.
If not actually opposed to Suffrage in 1913, Woodrow Wilson had every
appearance of opposition; certainly he was utterly indifferent to it.
But Alice Paul believed that he was amenable to education on the
subject, and she proceeded to educate him. Her theory proved to be true,
but the process took longer than she had anticipated. Her methods of
course aroused storms of criticism; but in the end they triumphed. The
President’s action during the six years’ siege was the attitude of all
politicians. That is to say, for a long time he made general statements
of a vaguely encouraging nature to the Suffragists, but for a long time
he actually did nothing. Every accepted method of convincing him of the
justice of the cause was tried. Deputation after deputation waited on
him and stated their case. Then he began to move. He came out for Woman
Suffrage as a principle; he voted for it in New Jersey but he still
believed that the enfranchisement of woman must come by States. In 1917,
his position, except for these minor admissions, was exactly that of
1913. As far as the Suffrage Amendment was concerned, he had not budged
an inch. The Woman’s Party then tried desperate remedies and afterward
more and more desperate remedies. These always produced results—towards
the end, _immediate_ results. But at the beginning of this period, the
Suffragists found that the instant they relaxed, the President relaxed;
his attention departed from Suffrage. This always happened. Then the
Congressional Committee began to exert a little more pressure, and the
President’s attention came back to Suffrage. In the long attacking
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account