The Strand Magazine, Vol. 27, Issue 160, April, 1904Various
General
The Strand Magazine, Vol. 27, Issue 160, April, 1904
Various
English literature -- Periodicals; Short stories, English -- Periodicals
The unfortunate architect was beside himself with rage at the suggestion.
He protested, but he protested in vain. The complaisant committee had quite
fallen in with Wyatt's idea. But it was not so the Government, the Royal
Academy, and the Press. They heaped ridicule upon both the project and the
sculptor. They roundly declared that it would ruin the unity and symmetry
of his building. Then began an acrimonious discussion between the friends
of Wyatt and the objectors to his proposed statue. All London divided
itself into factions. The common topic of drawing room and dinner
conversation was, "Are you for or against putting a gigantic Iron Duke on
the top of the arch?" "Brazen impudence!" wrote Thackeray, himself an
artist.
Meanwhile, in the studio in the Harrow Road, opposite the Dudley Arms
Tavern, the lucky sculptor had been proceeding with his task. He prepared
several models and designs, and the sub-committee availed themselves of a
model of the Hyde Park Corner arch to consider, which they did with the
greatest attention, the position and relative size of the statue to be
placed on the summit. Wyatt then prepared a drawing of the arch with the
equestrian statue, of which the sub-committee approved.
But at this point the Lords of the Treasury stepped in with an injunction.
As the modelling and casting went on the battle raged. Macaulay wrote from
India that the sculptor and his friends "ought to be in Bedlam"; his
antagonist, Croker, inquired blandly "what a Whig Dissenter knew of high
art." "High" art then became a joke. To the query, "What is the very
_highest_ form of art?" the jocular answer was, "Wyatt's Duke." The
newspapers between 1840 and 1846 contain innumerable references to and
descriptions of the statue, and the progress it was making towards
completion.
We are told that the plaster of Paris used in the stupendous work
considerably exceeded one hundred tons; it was formed upon a turn-plate, or
revolving platform, upwards of twenty feet across, travelling upon forty
rollers and weighing in itself several tons. The vastness of the model
required certain precautions to ensure its integrity. To give strength to
the body of the horse, a beam passed through it longitudinally, like a
backbone from which spring traverse timbers, like the ribs of a ship. From
the body of the horse was a line of iron bolts, beneath which, in the early
stage of the modelling, were placed props for security in shifting the
figure by means of the platform, so as to obtain the most desirable
position for light, etc. To reach the different parts of the statue a
travelling stage with a shifting floor was constructed, so that it might be
adjusted to any height.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account