The Strange Schemes of Randolph MasonPost, Melville Davisson
General
The Strange Schemes of Randolph Mason
Post, Melville Davisson
American fiction -- 19th century; Detective and mystery stories, American; Legal stories, American
It is significant that the general plan of this kind of tale has never
once been changed to any degree. The writers, one and all, have labored,
often with great genius, to construct problems in crime, where by acute
deduction the criminal and his methods were determined; or, reversing
it, they have sought to plan the crime so cunningly as to effectually
conceal the criminal and his methods. The intent has always been to
baffle the trailer, and when the identity of the criminal was finally
revealed, the story ended.
The high ground of the field of crime has not been explored; it has not
even been entered. The book-stalls have been filled to weariness with
tales based upon plans whereby the _detective_, or _ferreting_ power
of the State might be baffled. But, prodigious marvel! no writer has
attempted to construct tales based upon plans whereby the _punishing_
power of the State might be baffled.
The distinction, if one pauses for a moment to consider it, is striking.
It is possible, even easy, deliberately to plan crimes so that the
criminal agent and the criminal agency cannot be detected. Is it
possible to plan and execute wrongs in such a manner that they will have
all the effect and all the resulting profit of desperate crimes and yet
not be crimes before the law?
There is, perhaps, nothing of which the layman is so grossly ignorant
as of the law. He has grown to depend upon what he is pleased to call
common sense. Indeed his refrain, "The law is common sense," has at
times been echoed by the judiciary. There was never a graver error. The
common sense of the common man is at best a poor guide to the criminal
law. It is no guide at all to the civil law.
There is here no legal heresy. Lord Coke, in the seventeenth century,
declared that the law was not the natural reason of man, and that men
could not, out of their common reason, make such laws as the laws of
England were. The laws have not grown simpler, surely, and if they could
not be constructed by the common reason of men, they could certainly not
be determined by it. That men have but indistinct ideas of the law is to
be regretted and deplored. For their protection they should know it; and
there is need of this protection. The voices of all men were not joined
in the first great cry for law and order, nor are they all joined now.
The hands of a part of mankind have ever been set against their fellows;
for what great reason no man can tell. Maybe the Potter marred some, and
certainly evil Circumstance marred some. But, by good hap, industry has
always, and intelligence has usually, been on the law's side. Ofttimes,
however, the Ishmælites raise up a genius and he, spying deep, sees the
weak places in the law and the open holes in it, and forces through,
to the great hurt of his fellows. And men standing in the market-places
marvel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account