The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of InsectsMiall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Science
The Structure and Life-history of the Cockroach (Periplaneta orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of Insects
Miall, L. C. (Louis Compton)
Cockroaches
All that we know of Malpighi commands our respect. Precise and rapid
in his work, keen to discover points of real interest, never losing
himself in details, but knowing when he had done enough, he stands
pre-eminent in the crowd of minute anatomists, who are generally
faithful in a few things, but very unfit to be made rulers over many
things. The last distinct glimpse which we get of him is interesting.
Dr. Tancred Robinson, writing to John Ray, from Geneva, April 18th,
1684, tells how he met Malpighi at Bologna. They talked of the origin
of fossils, and Malpighi could not contain himself about Martin
Lister’s foolish hypothesis that fossils were sports of nature. “Just
as I left Bononia,” he continues, “I had a lamentable spectacle of
Malpighi’s house all in flames, occasioned by the negligence of his
old wife. All his pictures, furniture, books, and manuscripts were
burnt. I saw him in the very heat of the calamity, and methought I
never beheld so much Christian patience and philosophy in any man
before; for he comforted his wife, and condoled nothing but the loss of
his papers, which are more lamented than the Alexandrian Library, or
Bartholine’s Bibliothece, at Copenhagen.”[3]
[3] Correspondence of John Ray, p. 142.
_Swammerdam on the Honey Bee._
Swammerdam’s great posthumous work, the Biblia Naturæ, contains about a
dozen life-histories of Insects worked out in more or less detail. Of
these the May-fly (published during the author’s life-time, in 1675) is
the most famous; that on the Honey Bee the most elaborate. Swammerdam
was ten years younger than Malpighi, and knew Malpighi’s treatise on
the Silkworm--a not inconsiderable advantage. His working-life as a
naturalist comes within the ten years between 1663 and 1673; and this
short space of time was darkened by anxiety about money, as well as by
the religious fanaticism, which in the end completely extinguished his
activity. The vast amount of highly-finished work which he accomplished
in these ten years justifies Boerhaave’s rather rhetorical account
of his industry. Unfortunately, Boerhaave, whom we have to thank
not only for a useful sketch of Swammerdam’s life, but also for the
preservation of most of his writings, was only twelve years old when
the great naturalist died, and his account cannot be taken as personal
testimony. Swammerdam, he tells us, worked with a simple microscope and
several powers. His great skill lay in his dexterous use of scissors.
Sometimes he employed tools so fine as to require whetting under the
microscope. He was famous for inflated and injected preparations. As
to his patience, it is enough to say that he would spend whole days
in clearing a single caterpillar. Boerhaave gives us a picture of
Swammerdam at work which the reader does not soon forget. “His labours
were superhuman. Through the day he observed incessantly, and at night
he described and drew what he had seen. By six o’clock in the morning
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account