The Struggle for Imperial Unity: Recollections & ExperiencesDenison, George T. (George Taylor)
History
The Struggle for Imperial Unity: Recollections & Experiences
Denison, George T. (George Taylor)
Canada -- History -- 1867-1914
At a meeting of the Executive Committee held on the 15th May the
resolution was passed in these words:
That while maintaining its traditional policy of neutrality in all
matters affecting tariffs and fiscal arrangements, the Council of the
League have pleasure in resolving that it will do everything in its
power to provide facilities for Colonel Denison, the distinguished
President of the League in Canada, to express publicly his views
before the Chambers of Commerce and other important bodies in this
country.
This resolution was published in the newspapers, and the action of the
Council was known to the Liberal leaders.
On the 7th May I dined at the Annual Banquet of the Newspaper Society,
and responded to the toast of "The Guests," where I had an admirable
opportunity of bringing my proposition before a large number of editors
of newspapers from all over Great Britain.
The Aberdeen _Journal_ commenting upon this dinner said:--
Perhaps the most interesting speech of the evening was the last one.
It was delivered by Colonel Denison, a Canadian, and President of the
Empire League in Canada. He stated that he had been sent over to this
country to do what he could to promote a movement for the defence of
the Empire, and indicated that one of the proposals to be discussed
at the Colonial Conference at the coronation would be one to impose
a duty on foreign imports at every port in the Empire, in order to
raise an Imperial Defence Fund common to the whole Empire. He said the
duty might be 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 per cent. There was one exclamation
of dissent when this proposal was mentioned, but Colonel Denison's
breezy, confident manner, and evidently strong conviction on the
subject, excited general sympathy. Lord Tweedmouth's attitude during
the Colonel's speech, as it may be described, suggesting an Imperial
war tax, was rather quizzical than sympathetic.
By this time the newspapers were beginning to notice my work.
Fortunately for me about the same time Mr. Seddon had been speaking
on similar lines in South Africa, and Sir Wilfrid Laurier also in the
Canadian House of Commons. This alarmed the Liberal party, and the
_Manchester Guardian_ began to criticise and find fault with me to my
great satisfaction, for I knew I could stand anything better than being
ignored.
A friend of mine in the Liberal ranks told me about this time that the
leading Liberals were in a great state of anxiety at my work. They
believed, he said, that Chamberlain, Seddon, and Sir Wilfrid Laurier
had all agreed that the scheme was to be put through at the Imperial
Conference, and that I had come over as an advance agent, to break
the ice, to open the discussion, and prepare the way. I evaded making
any definite reply to this suggestion, jokingly saying that I was not
surprised to hear that they were anxious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account