The Struggle for Imperial Unity: Recollections & ExperiencesDenison, George T. (George Taylor)
History
The Struggle for Imperial Unity: Recollections & Experiences
Denison, George T. (George Taylor)
Canada -- History -- 1867-1914
He had heard a gentleman from Manchester say that it was all very well
for Canada, and that Canada wanted it. He was one of the very earliest
of Canadians who advocated preferential tariffs. In 1887 he began with
a number of other men who were working with him, to educate the people
of Canada on the subject. When they first began they were laughed at;
they were told it was a fad, and it was contrary to the principles of
free trade. When he came to England years ago he could find hardly a
single man anywhere who would say anything against free trade. He was
perfectly satisfied that for years English people would have listened
much more patiently to attacks upon the Christian religion than they
would have to attacks upon free trade.
Why did they advocate the system of preferential tariffs in Canada?
Because the country was founded by the old United Empire Loyalists,
who stood loyal to this country in 1776, who abandoned all their
worldly possessions, who left the graves of their dead, and came away
from the homes where they were born into the wilderness of Canada, and
who wanted to carry their own flag with them. They wanted to be in a
country where they were in connection with the Motherland, and it was
the dream of those loyalists to have a united Empire. Canadians were
not advocating preferential tariffs for the benefit of Canada.
He said, further, that if England would not give Canada a preference,
although Canada had already given England one, at least it was
advisable that England should have some tariff reform which would
prevent the wealth which belonged to this great Empire being
dissipated among its enemies. That was the reason they were advocating
the resolution. It was said that they desired to tax the poor man's
food. He said it was of the utmost importance to have food grown in
their own country. England in the past had had no reserves of food.
Fortunately they were now in such a position that, if they kept the
command of the sea, Canada would be able to grow enough in a year or
two for the needs of the United Kingdom. Seven years ago England was
in such a position that, if a combination of two nations had put an
embargo on food, she would have been brought to her knees at once.
Australia and Canada were now growing more wheat, but everything
depended upon the navy; and if England allowed her trade and her
markets, and the profits which could be made out of the markets, to be
used by foreign and rival Powers to build navies, they were not only
helping those foreign nations to build navies at their own cost, but
at the same time the people of this country had to be taxed to build
ships to counterbalance what their enemies were doing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account