The little collation was in the mean time brought up, and the company,
under the conduct of the musical artist, made the most successful
attacks on the ham and veal cutlet. The Göttingen sausage, moreover, an
imitation of the renowned Sulzer, was as little spared as the
potato-salad, and the scattered remains soon alone marked the
battle-field. A noble Rhine-wine recruited the muscles of the jaw, and
loosed again the tongue of the brave combatants. The affairs of the day
became the subject of discourse, and occurrences in Hanover, which then
appeared likely vitally to affect the interests of all Germany, were
eagerly discussed by all. Mr. Traveller, as the representative of
England, stated the strong feeling which there prevailed against the
King of Hanover, and so they came to talk of the prevailing views and
theories in England, on many subjects, and Mr. Traveller speedily
entangled himself in a discussion on Phrenology, which he endeavoured
to defend. Freisleben, a determined opponent to the theory, immediately
took up the subject zealously.
Freisleben.--They are now signs on the skull that man will expound,
formerly they were signs in the heaven. What unpardonable presumption,
from certain deviations from the regularity of the outer form, to infer
an analogical change of the soul. A leap which, according to my
opinion, is not less than from comets' tails to war. What presumption,
from the body to seek to form conclusions upon the spirit, whose mode
of connexion with it is to us totally unknown! It strikes me exactly as
if any one should infer or assert the possession of a fine sense of
smell, from the existence of a huge nose, or, as dancing is a function
of the foot, that he who has a great foot must be a capital dancer.
Mr. Traveller.--Throw the matter into ridicule as much as you please,
but take along with you at the same time the evidences which experience
furnishes.
Freisleben.--These evidences have long been shown to evidence nothing,
and it astonishes me that this doctrine of Gall and Spurzheim, this
ephemeral structure, can find so much acceptance in England.
Mr. Traveller.--I know the thing only by popular representations. But
the principles which are herein derived from anatomy and physiology, to
which Gall and Spurzheim have rendered much service, the grounds which
pathology and comparative anatomy also furnish, appear to me worthy of
all attention.
Pittschaft.--That nobody denies; but Gall having rendered essential
service to the anatomy of the brain, by no means justifies his
doctrine.
Freisleben.--His theory must fall, when it is assailed _a priori_, or
by experience. Above all things, unphilosophical, not to say
ridiculous, is his distribution into twenty-seven senses. By what right
has he only so many set forth; and why is a boundary drawn here?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account