This serious doubt (that of Kotzebue) has fallen heavily on the heart.
We have, therefore, with eagerness undertaken the following proposal
for its solution. In Kotzebue's right hand lies, in fact, the means to
bring the matter to a tolerable certainty. If that gentleman will in
future take the field against the clamour for a constitution in all his
Plays with the same sober earnestness, and jibe and joke, with which he
has powerfully and perseveringly attacked other follies, then will the
success or the failure of his piece throw great light on the sentiments
of the people; and the multitude who, Herr von Kotzebue so justly
says, remain silent on the matter in debate--that means, _they print
nothing on it_--will certainly, by applauding or censuring, clapping
or hissing, speak out. Should the multitude, by hissing out
anti-constitutional pieces, declare for a constitution, so might the
theatre immediately furnish the government with a proof whether the
declaration was worthy of notice. They might now, as was done in Paris,
after the acting of Germanica, march soldiers--actual soldiers--upon
the stage, and let them present arms to the pit. If the multitude now
applauded or ran away, it would be the height of the ridiculous to give
them a constitution, since it would be manifest that they had not
courage to maintain themselves against the hand of power. But hissed
and clamoured they still, it would be time "to _prepare_ the demanded
_preparations_ for the _preparation_ of a constitution."[6]
Sand assigned the ground of his hate against Kotzebue, immediately in
the opening of his trial, and he reiterated the same as his actuating
motive at its close; namely,--in the evening after the murder, having
lost his voice, and being only able to express himself by signs, he
requested paper, and wrote with a blacklead pencil these scarcely
legible words:--"August von Kotzebue is the corrupter of youth,"--
alluding to Kotzebue's frequently slippery writings, as 'Barth with the
Iron Brow,' and such like,--"the slanderer of our people's history, and
the Russian spy upon our Fatherland."
Sand asserted, that by the insight which he had obtained into the
character and position of Kotzebue, he immediately perceived that it
was impossible that he could much longer continue to live in that
manner; but the resolution to destroy him with his own hand did not
awake suddenly in him, it demanded gradual growth, and came not to
maturity without a severe strife in his own bosom. The well-known
history of the discovered bulletin at length threw unquenchable fuel on
his burning hatred against Kotzebue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account