Among the iron-_producing_ countries of the globe Great Britain occupies
by far the first rank, and there is every reason to believe that it will
long continue to maintain it. The British ores, indeed, are generally
poor, as clay, silica, phosphorus, and a variety of impurities which are
with difficulty separated from the metal, enter into the composition of
those which supply the greatest part of our iron; but this deficiency is
more than counterbalanced by many advantages. Most of the British iron
mines are situated in those districts where coal is cheapest, the ore
being often even raised from the same pit as that from which the coal is
extracted. Limestone, the necessary flux, is at hand, while fire-clay,
no unimportant article in the building of the furnaces, on whose long-
continued working so much depends, is found in the same ground as the
ore itself. The largest and most complete manufactories have long been
established in the most convenient places. With an almost unlimited
amount of capital, the most perfect and the cheapest communication by
water is open to all parts of the world; and the further processes which
the metal has to undergo are performed at once on the spot in the best
manner and at the smallest possible expense. No other land can boast of
equal or greater facilities for the production of an unlimited quantity
of cheap iron, so that, even with the assistance of heavy protective
duties, most of the iron-producing countries of Europe find it difficult
to compete in their own markets with the produce of Great Britain.
The art of making iron in this country is of very ancient though of
unascertained date. It was probably found by the Romans in a far
advanced state. It certainly was carried on by them subsequently to a
great extent—a fact proved by the immense beds of iron cinders
discovered in the Forest of Dean; nor has it ever been discontinued by
the other races who in succession have held sway in the island. But,
though of such ancient origin, and enjoying so many natural advantages,
our iron manufacture remained confined within very narrow limits so long
as the ore was exclusively smelted by means of charcoal made from wood.
The manufacture was even for some time partially prohibited in England,
the consumption of wood-charcoal in the process of smelting being so
great as to create apprehensions that, if care were not taken of the
remaining forests, enough timber would not be left to supply the wants
of the navy. It seems almost incredible in our days that Acts were
passed in the reigns of Elizabeth and James forbidding the felling of
timber for the smelting of iron, except in certain districts of Kent,
Sussex, and Surrey, then the principal seats of the manufacture, and
even there the erection of new works was expressly forbidden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account