The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
History
The Suffragette: The History of the Women's Militant Suffrage Movement, 1905-1910
Pankhurst, E. Sylvia (Estelle Sylvia)
Women -- Suffrage -- Great Britain
It is always more difficult to carry out a weak policy than a strong
one, and the adoption of this particular policy not only failed to
advance the Suffrage cause, but also failed in one object for which it
primarily was designed, namely, to prevent dissension in the ranks of
the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies itself. Many members
at once seceded and joined the Women's Social and Political Union,
and many of those who did not actually resign their membership of the
old society now threw all their energy into working for the younger,
more active and courageous body. On the other hand, there were still
those Liberal women who cared more for party than for principle to
be reckoned with, and one of these, Lady Carlisle, resigned the Vice
Presidentship of the N. U. W. S. S., which she had accepted but a few
days before the new by-election policy had been announced, because, in
her party-ridden opinion, to oppose a Liberal candidate who was opposed
to their enfranchisement, seemed too "drastic" and "extreme" a course
for women to adopt.
When the by-election policy of the N. U. W. S. S. came to be put
into practice its unworkable character was immediately demonstrated.
The candidates at Hexham were interviewed, with the result that
the Unionist, Colonel Bates, returned what was considered to be a
favourable answer, whilst the reply of Mr. R. D. Holt, the Liberal,
was said to be unsatisfactory. The National Union of Women's Suffrage
Societies was therefore, according to the newly framed policy, obliged
to support the Conservative candidate, but, when they proceeded to do
so, many of the Liberal members of the organisation objected, and some
even went so far as to work for the Liberal candidate in opposition to
their Secretary, Miss Edith Palliser, and the rest of the Society. To
make matters even more embarrassing for those who were endeavouring to
carry out the policy the Liberal candidate now veered round a point or
two--as candidates so often will--and stated that he had always been
in favour of women's enfranchisement and that his only fear was that
women were not asking for their votes upon a sufficiently democratic
basis. He was therefore proclaimed by his supporters to be a staunch
and devoted friend of the Women's Suffrage Cause.
Meanwhile the Suffragettes foresaw very clearly that this new policy
which would sometimes cause the Suffragists to support the Government
candidate whom they themselves were strenuously working against would
confuse the electors and increase the difficulty of explaining the
anti-Government policy, and, though the anti-Government policy was a
very simple one, even simple things are difficult to explain when hosts
of people are striving to misrepresent them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account