The Sun changes its position in space: therefore it cannot be regarded as being "in a condition of rest"Tischner, August
History
The Sun changes its position in space: therefore it cannot be regarded as being "in a condition of rest"
Tischner, August
Solar system -- Miscellanea
If the sun is _not fixed_, the system of Copernicus falls to ground.
Either the sun moves, or does not; a moving sun in a condition of rest,
_is an impossibility_.
If the sun moves, there is _no fixed centre_, there are _no closed or
recurrent curves and no plains of orbits_. If these must be obtained at
any price, the sun must be definitively fixed, it cannot be permitted
_to move onwards and yet at the same time not to move_.
The fact that the sun moves, cannot now be altered and cannot be any
longer ignored; and if mathematicians and astronomers do notwithstanding
assert, that the sun may with reference to its own planetary system be
regarded as fixed, or in a condition of rest, in that the system moves
as a whole without any change taking place in the relative position of
the planets to each other, or in their relation to the sun; in fact
without any alteration taking place in the _configuration_ of the
system--we reply, this is one of those meaningless phrases, which should
find no place in a scientific discussion. _A body which is in motion
cannot be in any way regarded as being motionless_, it would be just as
reasonable to say that a locomotive, dragging a train of carriages full
of passengers, could with reference to the latter be regarded as
motionless.
The actual meaning of such an assertion is that the planets are attached
to the sun in such a manner, that they can neither approach to, nor
recede from it, but must follow it whithersoever it goes.
We may in thought pursue a train of hypotheses and suppositions, but
they do not thereby acquire reality; still, in a normal condition of the
human intellect, it is impossible to conceive that any thing can exist
and not exist at the same time.
From this confusion of ideas, it might seem as if theoretical astronomy
had got into an untenable position which is irreconcilable with science
and ought therefore to endeavour to enter upon a better state, as soon
as possible. _Theory ought therefore, either to have accepted as a fact,
the motion proper to the sun with all its inevitable consequences, or
else, to have denied this motion altogether._ But the astronomers ignore
this alternative, they have decided, once for all and irrevocably _that
the sun moves and that at the same time it shall be motionless_. In this
manner science loses its reputation and all learnedly technical
expressions and formulas are not sufficient to cover the weak part. _The
sun cannot be rendered motionless_, and if astronomers and men of
science of the present day continue to ignore this fact, they need not
be surprised at the inevitable consequences of their own acts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account