The Superstition of DivorceChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Religion
The Superstition of Divorce
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Divorce
terminated. It is something older than all institutions or contracts,
and something that is certain to outlast them all. All the other revolts
are real, because there remains a possibility that the things may be
destroyed, or at least divided. You can abolish capitalists; but you
cannot abolish males. Prussians can go out of Poland or negroes can be
repatriated to Africa; but a man and a woman must remain together in one
way or another; and must learn to put up with each other somehow.
These are very simple truths; that is why nobody nowadays seems to take
any particular notice of them; and the truth that follows next is
equally obvious. There is no dispute about the purpose of Nature in
creating such an attraction. It would be more intelligent to call it the
purpose of God; for Nature can have no purpose unless God is behind it.
To talk of the purpose of Nature is to make a vain attempt to avoid
being anthropomorphic, merely by being feminist. It is believing in a
goddess because you are too sceptical to believe in a god. But this is
a controversy which can be kept apart from the question, if we content
ourselves with saying that the vital value ultimately found in this
attraction is, of course, the renewal of the race itself. The child is
an explanation of the father and mother; and the fact that it is a human
child is the explanation of the ancient human ties connecting the father
and mother. The more human, that is the less bestial, is the child, the
more lawful and lasting are the ties. So far from any progress in
culture or the sciences tending to loosen the bond, any such progress
must logically tend to tighten it. The more things there are for the
child to learn, the longer he must remain at the natural school for
learning them; and the longer his teachers must at least postpone the
dissolution of their partnership. This elementary truth is hidden to-day
in vast masses of vicarious, indirect and artificial work, with the
fundamental fallacy of which I shall deal in a moment. Here I speak of
the primary position of the human group, as it has stood through
unthinkable ages of waxing and waning civilisations; often unable to
delegate any of its work, always unable to delegate all of it. In this,
I repeat, it will always be necessary for the two teachers to remain
together, in proportion as they have anything to teach. One of the
shapeless sea-beasts, that merely detaches itself from its offspring and
floats away, could float away to a submarine divorce court, or an
advanced club founded on free-love for fishes. The sea-beast might do
this, precisely because the sea-beast’s offspring need do nothing;
because it has not got to learn the polka or the multiplication table.
All these are truisms but they are also truths, and truths that will
return; for the present tangle of semi-official substitutes is not only
a stop-gap, but one that is not big enough to stop the gap. If people
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account