The Superstition of DivorceChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Religion
The Superstition of Divorce
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Divorce
This nucleus of natural authority has always existed in the midst of
more artificial authorities. It has always been regarded as something in
the literal sense individual; that is, as an absolute that could not
really be divided. A baby was not even a baby apart from its mother; it
was something else, most probably a corpse. It was always recognised as
standing in a peculiar relation to government; simply because it was one
of the few things that had not been made by government; and could to
some extent come into existence without the support of government.
Indeed the case for it is too strong to be stated. For the case for it
is that there is nothing like it; and we can only find faint parallels
to it in those more elaborate and painful powers and institutions that
are its inferiors. Thus the only way of conveying it is to compare it to
a nation; although, compared to it, national divisions are as modern
and formal as national anthems. Thus I may often use the metaphor of a
city; though in its presence a citizen is as recent as a city clerk. It
is enough to note here that everybody does know by intuition and admit
by implication that a family is a solid fact, having a character and
colour like a nation. The truth can be tested by the most modern and
most daily experiences. A man does say “That is the sort of thing the
Browns will like”; however tangled and interminable a psychological
novel he might compose on the shades of difference between Mr. and Mrs.
Brown. A woman does say “I don’t like Jemima seeing so much of the
Robinsons”; and she does not always, in the scurry of her social or
domestic duties, pause to distinguish the optimistic materialism of Mrs.
Robinson from the more acid cynicism which tinges the hedonism of Mr.
Robinson. There is a colour of the household inside, as conspicuous as
the colour of the house outside. That colour is a blend, and if any tint
in it predominate it is generally that preferred by Mrs. Robinson. But,
like all composite colours, it is a separate color, as separate as green
is from blue and yellow. Every marriage is a sort of wild balance; and
in every case the compromise is as unique as an eccentricity.
Philanthropists walking in the slums often see the compromise in the
street, and mistake it for a fight. When they interfere, they are
thoroughly thumped by both parties; and serve them right, for not
respecting the very institution that brought them into the world.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account