The Superstition of DivorceChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Religion
The Superstition of Divorce
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Divorce
There is one view very common among the liberal-minded which is
exceedingly fatiguing to the clear-headed. It is symbolised in the sort
of man who says, “These ruthless bigots will refuse to bury me in
consecrated ground, because I have always refused to be baptised.” A
clear-headed person can easily conceive his point of view, in so far as
he happens to think that baptism does not matter. But the clear-headed
will be completely puzzled when they ask themselves why, if he thinks
that baptism does not matter, he should think that burial does matter.
If it is in no way imprudent for a man to keep himself from a
consecrated font, how can it be inhuman for other people to keep him
from a consecrated field? It is surely much nearer to mere superstition
to attach importance to what is done to a dead body than to a live
baby. I can understand a man thinking both superstitious, or both
sacred; but I cannot see why he should grumble that other people do not
give him as sanctities what he regards as superstitions. He is merely
complaining of being treated as what he declares himself to be. It is as
if a man were to say, “My persecutors still refuse to make me king, out
of mere malice because I am a strict republican.” Or it is as if he
said, “These heartless brutes are so prejudiced against a teetotaler,
that they won’t even give him a glass of brandy.”
The fashion of divorce would not be a modern fashion if it were not full
of this touching fallacy. A great deal of it might be summed up as a
most illogical and fanatical appetite for getting married in churches.
It is as if a man should practice polygamy out of sheer greed for
wedding cake. Or it is as if he provided his household with new shoes,
entirely by having them thrown after the wedding carriage when he went
off with a new wife. There are other ways of procuring cake or
purchasing shoes; and there are other ways of setting up a human
establishment. What is unreasonable is the request which the modern man
really makes of the religious institutions of his fathers. The modern
man wants to buy one shoe without the other; to obtain one half of a
supernatural revelation without the other. The modern man wants to eat
his wedding cake and have it, too.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account