[61] The substitution of the Senate bill was a victory for the anti-slavery party, as all battles had to be fought again. The Southern party, however, succeeded in carrying all its amendments. [62] Messrs. Betton of New Hampshire, Chittenden of Vermont, Garnett and Trigg of Virginia, and D.R. Williams of South Carolina voted against the bill: _House Journal_ (repr. 1826), 9 Cong. 2 sess. V. 585-6. [63] _Annals of Cong._, 9 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 626-7. [64] The unassigned dates refer to debates, etc. The history of the amendments and debates on the measure may be traced in the following references:-- _Senate_ (Bill No. 41). _Annals of Cong._, 9 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 20-1; 9 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 16, 19, 23, 33, 36, 45, 47, 68, 69, 70, 71, 79, 87, 93, etc. _Senate Journal_ (repr. 1826), 9 Cong. 1-2 sess. IV. 11, 112, 123, 124, 132, 133, 150, 158, 164, 165, 167, 168, etc. * * * * * _House_ (Bill No. 148). _Annals of Cong._, 9 Cong. 1 sess. p. 438; 9 Cong. 2 sess. pp. 114, 151, 167-8, 173-4, 180, 183, 189, 200, 202-4, 220, 228, 231, 240, 254, 264, 266-7, 270, 273, 373, 427, 477, 481, 484-6, 527, 528, etc. _House Journal_ (repr. 1826), 9 Cong. 1-2 sess. V. 470, 482, 488, 490, 491, 496, 500, 504, 510, 513-6, 517, 540, 557, 575, 579, 581, 583-4, 585, 592, 594, 610, 613-5, 623, 638, 640, etc. [65] _Statutes at Large_, II. 426. There were some few attempts to obtain laws of relief from this bill: see, e.g., _Annals of Cong._, 10 Cong. 1 sess. p. 1243; 11 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 34, 36-9, 41, 43, 48, 49, 380, 465, 688, 706, 2209; _House Journal_ (repr. 1826), II Cong. 1-2 sess. VII. 100, 102, 124, etc., and Index, Senate Bill No. 8. Cf. _Amer. State Papers, Miscellaneous_, II. No. 269. There was also one proposed amendment to make the prohibition perpetual: _Amer. State Papers, Miscellaneous_, I. No. 244. [66] Toulmin, _Digest of the Laws of Alabama_, p. 637. [67] _Laws of North Carolina_ (revision of 1819), II. 1350. [68] Prince, _Digest_, p. 793. [69] Fowler, _Historical Status of the Negro in Connecticut_, in _Local Law_, etc., pp. 122, 126. [70] _House Reports_, 17 Cong. 1 sess. II. No. 92, p. 32. [71] _House Journal_ (repr. 1826), 11 Cong. 3 sess. VII. p. 435. [72] _House Doc._, 15 Cong. 2 sess. IV. No. 84, p. 5. [73] See, e.g., _House Journal_ (repr. 1826), 11 Cong. 3 sess. VII. p. 575. [74] Drake, _Revelations of a Slave Smuggler_, p. 51. Parts of this narrative are highly colored and untrustworthy; this passage, however, has every earmark of truth, and is confirmed by many incidental allusions.