The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America: 1638-1870Du Bois, W. E. B. (William Edward Burghardt)
History
The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America: 1638-1870
Du Bois, W. E. B. (William Edward Burghardt)
Slave trade -- United States -- History
[119] _Annals of Cong._, 15 Cong. 2 sess. p. 1430. This
insured the trial of slave-traders in a sympathetic slave
State, and resulted in the "disappearance" of many captured
Negroes.
[120] _Statutes at Large_, III. 533.
[121] The first of a long series of appropriations extending
to 1869, of which a list is given on the next page. The totals
are only approximately correct. Some statutes may have escaped
me, and in the reports of moneys the surpluses of previous
years are not always clearly distinguishable.
[122] In the first session of the sixteenth Congress, two
bills on piracy were introduced into the Senate, one of which
passed, April 26. In the House there was a bill on piracy, and
a slave-trade committee reported recommending that the
slave-trade be piracy. The Senate bill and this bill were
considered in Committee of the Whole, May 11, and a bill was
finally passed declaring, among other things, the traffic
piracy. In the Senate there was "some discussion, rather on
the form than the substance of these amendments," and "they
were agreed to without a division": _Senate Journal_, 16 Cong.
1 sess. pp. 238, 241, 268, 287, 314, 331, 346, 350, 409, 412,
417, 420, 422, 424, 425; _House Journal_, 16 Cong. 1 sess. pp.
113, 280, 453, 454, 494, 518, 520, 522, 537; _Annals of
Cong._, 16 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 693-4, 2231, 2236-7, etc. The
debates were not reported.
[123] _Statutes at Large_, III. 600-1. This act was in reality
a continuation of the piracy Act of 1819, and was only
temporary. The provision was, however, continued by several
acts, and finally made perpetual by the Act of Jan. 30, 1823:
_Statutes at Large_, III. 510-4, 721. On March 3, 1823, it was
slightly amended so as to give district courts jurisdiction.
[124] Attorney-General Wirt advised him, October, 1819, that
no part of the appropriation could be used to purchase land in
Africa or tools for the Negroes, or as salary for the agent:
_Opinions of Attorneys-General_, I. 314-7. Monroe laid the
case before Congress in a special message Dec. 20, 1819
(_House Journal_, 16 Cong. 1 sess. p. 57); but no action was
taken there.
[125] Cf. Kendall's Report, August, 1830: _Senate Doc._, 21
Cong. 2 sess. I. No. 1, pp. 211-8; also see below, Chapter X.
[126] Speech in the House of Representatives, Feb. 15, 1819,
p. 18; published in Boston, 1849.
[127] Jay, _Inquiry into American Colonization_ (1838), p. 59,
note.
[128] Quoted in Friends' _Facts and Observations on the Slave
Trade_ (ed. 1841), pp. 7-8.
[129] _Annals of Cong._, 16 Cong. 1 sess. pp. 270-1.
[130] _Ibid._, p. 698.
[131] _Ibid._, p. 1207.
[132] _Annals of Cong._, 16 Cong. 1 sess. p. 1433.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account